A new religious “war” is brewing in Texas. The State Board of Education recently issued draft changes to the sixth-grade curriculum on world cultures. The current standards, dating back to 1997, suggest students should learn about the major religious festivals of Christmas, Easter, Ramadan, Rosh Hashanah, and Yom Kippur. The proposed changes would replace Christmas — a concept one can pick up through our culture without the need for schooling — with Diwali. Opponents of this proposal seem to think that American culture is all that matters and only those religions with the largest “market share” in the United States should have their festivals taught in schools. This isn’t a War on Christmas; it’s a War on Diwali.

- Justin Gillenwater

11 Responses to “War On Diwali”

I take the reasonable tack that Christmas is the dominant, most pre-eminent holiday in the US and that other cultures and faiths may have other celebrations which is more moderate than replacing Christmas with Diwali or that American culture is the exclusive important one. Maybe I’m too reasonable these-a-days.

Great point, Justin, and one that merits our alert attention! It is a false victory for those who support Diwali, and it will just be used to fuel the xenophobic hatred and rancor of those who say this is a “Christian” nation. I am not sure “reason” is the flavor “value of the day” any more, Richard, not when we have people touting death panels, socialist endoctrination, and “You Lie”, AND our mainstream press covers it as “news” on CNN.

This is silliness. Why can’t Texan kids learn about BOTH Christmas and Diwali? For that matter, why shouldn’t children across the country study ALL of our country’s rich religious and cultural traditions?

We all have much to learn from Easter, Ramadan, Rosh Hashanah, Yom Kippur, Diwali, AND Christmas.

Gautam, you’re falling into their trap. It’s about world cultures, not American culture. It’s virtually impossible to not encounter Christmas in this country, especially in Texas. Diwali is slightly more difficult to come by. In an ideal world, there’d be plenty of instructional time for festivals of far more religions.

I stick to my guns (and aptly so since we’re talking about Texas). We shouldn’t exclude a tradition like Christmas from being taught just because it’s “mainstream”.

Ironically, there’s more to learn about Christmas than meets the eye, especially because it’s become so commercialized. Indeed, how many people know that Jesus Christ wasn’t even born on Dec. 25?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1093053/Cancel-Christmas–Jesus-born-June-17-say-scientists.html

Let’s be inclusive, not exclusive.

Inclusiveness is good. I’d like to see the different ways Christmas is observed around the world taught, but there’s only so much time to teach.

The world has many religions and instead of rating and sorting them, students will just have to learn them all. Excluding Christmas would be negligent of true world culture as would be excluding Diwali. I think we’re all reasonable folk, though indeed the unthinking world of fast media works against us.

Brilliant idea, Richard. How do we find the school time to teach everything?

I agree that there is time to discuss Christmas in class with other faiths’ major holidays.

At the same time, I agree there’s only so much time for instruction. I am no expert, but I think for covering a topic like this, about three days worth of class time would be adequate for a fair but brief overview of all the holidays we’ve discussed in this thread.

I agree with others that both should be taught. Proposing that Christmas has to be replaced with Diwali doesn’t make sense to me. Those who are not Christian can learn about Christmas, and Christians can learn about other religions, and learn about Christmas. Some cities in Texas have a significant South Asian population, so I am surprised Diwali was not listed back in 1997.

I asked my college students for their viewpoint on this, and surprise, surprise, they think we should take every religious holiday off!!! I am sure, Justin, that would even cut into the shortage of time you see as a problem. The fact of the matter is that if we view our multicultural students and their parents as the source of this knowledge, then, as teachers, we can involve all families into this knowledge base and use these opportunities to bring the classroom and the home closer. We will be attacked by those who oppose multicultural education in the name of their xenophobia, but we need to be smart and 1) be sensitive to Justin’s awareness of the teacher’s workload, 2) be proactive in preempting our friends in the Judeo-Christian community that being inclusive make their slice of the pie smaller. We all are aiming for the same respect, the same attention. We just need to ratchet down the emotionalism attached to an egocentric way of looking at the world from each of us. It is not easy to sleep with the ennemy, but ultimately, it may be the only way to change the world.

Something to say?

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree