May 24, 2013

It Takes A Village To Blow One Up

West, Texas was best known as a place to grab something from the Czech Bakery while driving between Austin and the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex. Now, West is best known as the latest in a long line of American industrial disasters reprehensible for their utter preventability.

The explosion at the fertilizer plant comes from failure of the local, state, and federals governments and the plant owners and operators to satisfy the needs of worker safety, community safety, and national security. OSHA has not inspected the plant since 1985. Schools and homes were allowed to be built very near the plant. The plant had 1,350 times the amount of ammonium nitrate at which Department of Homeland Security regulation is triggered. We know the plant had so much ammonium nitrate, because paperwork indicating such was filed with with a Texas regulatory entity. The mishmash of regulators is not required to share information. Unlike the inability of first responders to communicate with each other because of technical incompatibilities, government regulators don’t interact with each other. Given the large variety of regulating agencies, better intercommunication is needed.

A tangle of agencies regulates plants like the one in West. Different agencies were assigned oversight for different chemicals there. Among the federal agencies responsible were the E.P.A., Homeland Security, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. State agencies include the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the state chemist’s office and the state health services department.

Ammonium nitrate is a national security concern because in nefarious hands it can cause this:

Murrah_Building_-_Aerial

Terrorism isn’t the only reason for concern about the large amount of such an explosive chemical:

The explosion was so powerful it leveled homes and left a crater 93 feet wide and 10 feet deep. Judging by the size of the crater and the extent of the damage — pieces of twisted metal landed in distant pastures, and ceiling tiles and lights shook loose in buildings two miles away — the explosion was more powerful than the Oklahoma City bombing, experts said.

Texas markets its lax regulations as a reason for businesses to relocate:

Loose regulations” in Texas may be a nice pitch for out-of-state business, however, in 2010 the state accounted for 10% of all workplace-related fatalities in the country. In 2011, Texas had the second-highest number of fatality investigations from OSHA (California was first), in 2010, Texas led the nation in Latino worker fatalities.

The marvelous economic tales spun about Texas even beguile those who should know better like a writer for Texas Monthly. Jack Ohman and the editors of the Sacramento Bee, however, were not beguiled:

RTSHf.St.4

The owners and operators of the plant seem to have long thought they could pick and choose what few regulations with which they were supposed to comply would apply to them. Among other problems, the company received a citation for construction of 6,000 gallon ammonia tanks without a permit, did not have a sufficient risk management plan, and had no signs or illegible signs on many storage tanks, many of which did not meet safety standards.

The Czech connection in West remains strong; the Czech Republic may provide nearly $200,000 to aid recovery. That’s very helpful and kind; it’s greatly appreciated. I wonder, though, if Bangladesh provides something even better, a guide on how to handle preventable disasters — arrest the owners.

How many other extremely dangerous plants and chemical storage facilities continue to operate in similar fashion with such disregard for the workers, the community, and national security?

- Justin Gillenwater

It’s All Up To What You Value

One week later and I’m still trying to wrap my head around the intense burst of awesomeness from Asian American Justice Center President and former Asian American Action Fund endorsee Mee Moua when she schooled Senator Sessions. Haven’t seen it? Take a look:

SESSIONS: Ms. Moua, maybe you can comment. Do you think that a nation that decides that they can admit an individual somehow has no right to say that that person’s brother would have to qualify independently, rather than being given a guaranteed entry in the country? Do you think a country can legitimately make that decision?

MOUA: Senator Sessions, coming from the Asian American community when in the 1880s we were the first people to be excluded explicitly by the United States immigration policy I’m well aware that this country has never hesitated in the way that it chooses to exercise its authority to permit people to either enter or depart its borders. And we know that the Asian American community in particular didn’t get to enjoy the benefit of immigration to this country until the 1960s when those restrictive policies were lifted. So I know very well and very aware that…

SESSIONS: Well let me just say, it seems to me. It’s perfectly logical to think there are two individuals, let’s say in a good friendly country like Honduras. One is a valedictorian of his class, has two years of college, learned English and very much has a vision to come to the United States and the other one has dropped out of high school, has minimum skills. Both are 20 years of age and that latter person has a brother here. What would be in the interest of the United States? …

MOUA: Senator I think that under your scenario people can conclude about which is in the best interest of the United States. I think the more realistic scenario is that in the second situation that individual will be female, would not have been permitted to get an education and if we would create a system where there would be some kind of preference given to say education, or some other kind of metrics, I think that it would truly disadvantage specifically women and their opportunity to come into this country

SESSIONS: Well that certainly is a problem around the world, and I would think that the primary problem with education and the fact that women have been discriminated against should be focused on the countries that are doing that primarily .

As you can see, Sessions essentially asked a rhetorical question of Moua without care for her answer. My guess is Sessions asked his rhetorical question so he could answer it. What astounds me — and where the awesomeness comes in — is Sessions was almost certainly asking another rhetorical question and yet Moua’s response was so profound that Sessions actually listened and responded to Moua instead of responding to his rhetorical question with more of his talking points. Sessions didn’t alter his position, but he did essentially say “you’re right” to Moua.

Notice Sessions didn’t slow down when Moua was schooling Sessions on Asian Americans. No, it was once she started schooling Sessions on women that he finally snapped out of his rhetoric and — if ever so briefly — into reality. Perhaps the Republican attempts to no longer appear to be “angry white men” party is making slightly more progress on the gender front? With our immigration system facing such incredible gender imbalances, such schooling is needed even for far more well-meaning politicians! Pramila Jayapal over at ColorLines has some great ideas on fixing those imbalances.

While Sessions isn’t Ted Cruz-level crazy, he’s not exactly the firebrand of positive policy. Sessions has blocked a child sex trafficking bill, suggested helping feed the hungry is immoral, and apparently delights in the suffering of illegal immigrant families. Yet somehow in 2003 Jeff Sessions received a 100% rating from the Christian Coalition for his stances on issues relation to families and children. Clearly Sessions values families. Unfortunately, it appears he and his ilk only value certain kinds of families.

What families do you value? I agree with more of Mee Moua’s wise words

Children will always be our children whether they’re over the age of 21 or not. For us to start thinking about which members of our family we’re going to trade away is a dramatic and drastic departure from the core values of what has been driving this country since the founding days.

Senators Boxer, Brown, Franken, Harkin, Hirono, Schatz, and Warren seem to agree too, having urged prioritization of family reunification and a clearing of family visa backlogs. I would go a step further urging a clearing of all backlogs; there’s up to a more than ten year backlog for employment-based immigrant visas too. While that pales in comparison to the backlog for immigrant visas for siblings from the Phillippinnes, a category with a backlog so embarrassing there are still priority dates from the 1980s which have yet to become current.

There’s more you can do than merely marvel at Mee Moua’s awesomeness. Add your name to the to the 18 Million Rising petition to tell Congress you stand for fair and just comprehensive immigration reform and they should too!

- Justin Gillenwater

Ten Lessons Learned From The 2012 Democratic National Convention

  1. Flying in a day early so you don’t miss anything is worthwhile
  2. An iPad with a keyboard case will greatly lighten your load compared to a 15″ MacBook Pro, but that will also greatly reduce your writing down to note taking. Next time try a MacBook Air.
  3. Making sure to take time out to really eat is important. Next time be sure to schedule time to write too.
  4. To decide where to take time to eat, Yelp won’t steer you wrong on where to eat.
  5. Diners that serve delicious Blue Bell ice cream and display PBS on their televisions actually exist!
  6. An umbrella you can stuff in your bag even when very wet will do well for you.
  7. Good friends who have your back are doubly important during convention week. They can get you in somewhere, save you a seat, watch your bag pile at a party while you take turns getting food & drinks, or hook you up with the last veggie burger — the limit is your imagination.
  8. Never trust a cab company when they say the taxi is on its way. And Uber is apt to be over capacity.
  9. The morning after the big speech, the airport won’t be as crazy as you expect.
  10. TSA Pre-Check is a good thing.

- Justin Gillenwater

The 2012 DNC AAPI Caucus

The second AAPI caucus meeting was well-attended and filled with remarks from a number of Asian American politicians, several Secretaries, and one Second Lady. I wish I could say the same for the first meeting, but I wasn’t there. It was over by the time I picked up my media credentials. Lesson learned.

Congresswoman Judy Chu, Chair of CAPAC, reminded everyone in the room that President Obama is good for our community, and I don’t just mean Asian Americans. Delegate Madeleine Bordallo of Guam reminded us President Obama grew up an island boy — he doesn’t forget about the territories. Perhaps the key takeaway from Chu’s remarks, Republicans are working so hard to prevent those who wish to register to vote from doing so — 81% of first time voters voted for Obama in 2008. Congressman Honda, former chair of CAPAC, rightfully declared Asian Americans the theoretical margin of victory, but only if we register to vote. Only 55% of eligible Asian Americans are registered.

Chu also focused on the anti-Asian sentiments percolating throughout unsavory elements of the American polity with particular focus on Pete Hoekstra bringing in yellowgirl in Michigan in the year of the 30th anniversary of Vincent Chin’s murder.

Chris Lu, President Obama’s Cabinet Secretary, noted that 2012 is not only the 30th anniversary of Vincent Chin’s murder but also the 70th anniversary of the Japanese Internment and 130th anniversary of the Chinese Exclusion Act. Lu also reminded us that before President Obama, a meeting of every Asian American Secretary throughout history would fit at a table for 2. Now if they all got together, there are many board games they wouldn’t be able to play together since Obama appointed the third, fourth, and fifth Asian American Secretaries.

Secretary Arne Duncan gave some of the best news of the caucus — the Department of Education is working to dispel the model minority myth. Duncan also shared that this was his first convention and he’s having a great time. There’s always something special about one’s first. Duncan stressed the importance of America leading the world in college graduation; the Department of Education is working to make that happen.

Secretary Hilda Solis reflected the feelings of many, many people. The Democratic National Convention looks like America, unlike the Republican National Convention. Solis also celebrated AAPI politicians and leaders, whom she collectively referred to as “fast and effective.” Solis’s words also included high praise for Michelle Obama.

Tina Tchen, Michelle Obama’s Chief of Staff, also praised the First Lady, noting how critical her work on childhood obesity is to many AAPI communities. Tchen reminded the crowd that 17 new Asian American federal judges have been appointed and confirmed thanks to President Obama with 3 more on track for confirmation.

Former White House Chief of Staff Pete Rouse expanded on the theme of federal judges, making the point Gautam says is ignored in this presidential race — 2 SCOTUS nominations could arise in the next presidential term. Rouse also urged everyone in the room to make their best efforts to maximize turnout.

Dr. Jill Biden appeared for a few brief remarks largely stressing the importance of involvement in the political process.

Maya Soetoro-Ng also spoke.

Daniel Inouye gave a speech that should have been televised.

Mayor Ed Lee was the most amusing speaker, upstaging Mike Honda, who usually has no competition for most amusing:

I’ll be short because I am.

On a personal note, I don’t know if anyone in the room needed or made use of it, but I greatly appreciate the accessibility provided to the hard-of-hearing:

- Justin Gillenwater

The Speech That Should Have Been Televised

Senator Daniel Inouye gave an incredible speech before the AAPI Caucus at the Democratic National Convention. He said what President Clinton came so close to saying in his incredib[ly long] speech Wednesday night. He used the r word, which he noted people are afraid to use.

Republicans are blatantly advocating racism

Senator Inouye told the crowd of outrages he faced as a young man:

  • The government classifying him as 4-C, enemy alien
  • Being told “we don’t cut Jap hair” in Oakland returning home in uniform after the war
  • Being refused service in Hawaii after the war because he was not white

Senator Inouye has spent most of his life fighting racism. He’s 3rd in line to the presidency, but “that doesn’t cut the ice.” When his brothers and sisters who are not from Europe are mistreated, it angers him.

Discrimination was rampant in his youth. We can’t go back to that.

Let’s cut that out.

- Justin Gillenwater

Honda Eastwooding

The rumors are true. Mike Honda Eastwooded at APIAVote‘s reception at the Democratic National Convention.

- Justin Gillenwater

Fantasy Cabinet: Romney Edition

No, no. Not Fantasy Cabaret — Fantasy Cabinet. Yes, I know it’s easy to get confused because the Republicans held their convention in Tampa, America’s strip club capital

What might Romney’s cabinet look like if he’s elected?

President Willard Mitt Romney
Vice President Paul Ryan
Secretary of State David Petraeus
Secretary of Defense Condoleezza Rice
Secretary of Homeland Security Steve King
Attorney General Chris Christie
Secretary of the Treasury Eric Kriss
Secretary of Energy Aubrey McClendon
Secretary of Commerce David Koch
Secretary of Labor Scott Walker
Secretary of Health and Human Services Bobby Jindal
Secretary of Education Rick Santorum
Secretary of Transportation John Thune
Secretary of the Interior Don Blankenship
Secretary of Agriculture Hugh Grant
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Bob McDonnell
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Joe Walsh
National Security Advisor Cofer Black
Director of the Office of Management and Budget Tim Pawlenty
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency Michelle Bachmann
Ambassador to the United Nations Christopher Burnham
United States Trade Representative Donald Trump
Drug Control Tzar Rick Scott

What do you think? Leave a comment!

- Justin Gillenwater

Steve King: Terrible Should Be His Middle Name

Did I mention Steve King is terrible? Oh yes I did.

He seems to be determined to continue in his terribleness at an incredible streak. In the past month , he’s tried to make the government inaccessible to people who don’t speak or are not literate in English. In support of this quest, he has asserted that identity-based groups are victims groups that “feel sorry for themselves.”

It started with Asians and it ended with Zeitgeist

King’s recent terribleness doesn’t end there. He’s pro-animal fighting and anti-reproductive health:

- Justin Gillenwater

Thanks to Our Advertisers

Thank you to our wonderful advertisers:

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Just kidding, but we’re now accepting advertising requests from similarly minded organizations.

We’ve just been accredited by the DNC to cover the DNCC. Our average time per visit is many fold the industry average. Our coverage of AAPIs in politics leads among both media and non-profit organizations.

To advertise with us, .

Tuesday In Texas

From a “nationally known Republican consultant,” according to Paul Burka

If Ted Cruz wins the Senate race, Texas will be a purple state in four years.

Polls just closed here in Texas for the runoffs. At 6:52 PM, according to Miya ShayKTRK reporter and Gene Wu’s fiancée — many voters were still in line at the West Gray Metropolitan Municipal Service Center. The line is expected to take 90 minutes to work its way to the voting machines: Ted Oberg, also of KTRK, reports nearly no drop off in turnout among Republican voters between the primary in May and today’s runoff. Kuff wonders wonders if the election day results matter when the races are essentially decided during the early vote period.

Wu, as I’ve mentioned once or twice. He leads the early vote + mail 449 to 214 (68 to 32). Feel free to try to figure out those votes based on turnout. If Wu is victorious, he will face M.J. Khan, meaning Texas will have another Asian American in the State House.

The federal race to watch — results here — is the Republican primary for US Senate between a teabagger and a might-as-well-be-a-teabagger , which saw $13 million in Super PAC spending.

Katherine Haenschen ponders the possible outcome of the race:

Personally, I’ve debated internally for months over who I’d rather see win the primary, and likely take the seat in November. Dewhurst is less crazy, more grounded in what passes for factual evidence in the Republican Party of Texas these days. He’d be less embarrassing to our state in the US Senate. He’s more of a “statesman,” though at times his campaign has behaved so very irresponsibly that he should be blushing every time that ad about driving a young man to suicide airs on the TV.

A Cruz victory, on the other hand, would make soon-to-be senior Senator John Cornyn irrelevant, since Cruz could steal the limelight from Big John’s thinly-veiled flailing racism with his out-and-out 100% capital-C Crazy. A Cruz win would also keep Dewhurst in the pink dome presiding over the Senate, a welcome relief from the likely ascension of Senator Dan Patrick, who might gladly help pass a law requiring actual chastity belts given the make-up of the incoming Senate next year. Cruz would be only 1 of 100 in the US Senate and has absolutely zero governing experience. It’s unlikely he could get much done. Both of them would have near-identical voting records. And Cruz might be easier to knock out in 6 years if demographics and revitalized TDP organizing actually come to fruition. And maybe, just maybe, a Cruz win would scare moderates and corporate Republicans into recognizing what the Tea Party truly has wrought here in Texas.

I’m undecided on who I would prefer to see win. Ted Cruz is the teabagger in the race, and he has some disgusting support.

Dewhurst really has no accomplishments to speak of, as Burka rightly notes

It is unfortunate that Dewhurst is cast in the role of defender of the faith. The poor guy has nothing to offer except snuggling up to Rick Perry. He has been in office for ten years and has little to show for it except a decade of toadying to the governor. I can’t think of a single achievement Dewhurst can claim while in office that isn’t also a Perry achievement. Well, the property tax cut of 05-06 was driven by the lieutenant governor’s office. The problem with Dewhurst isn’t that he doesn’t get what is going on. He gets it. It’s that he doesn’t have the political will to do something about it. Hence, the about-face on using the Rainy Day Fund last session, after which angry senators told me on the Senate floor that if there had been a vote of confidence on Dewhurst, the tally would have been 31-0 against.

Maybe that’s why when Dewhurst uses three words to summarize himself he uses

  • Conservative
  • Texas
  • Results

“Results” is a good summary word. “Conservative” isn’t really one when running in a Republican primary, especially in Texas. And “Texas?” Do voters forget what state they’re in? Why would you waste a word on that? It’s even more shocking in the commercial. I would embed it here, but the Dewhurst campaign has set that YouTube video to private.

If you want another money quote on the race, look no further:

Make no mistake: the future of the Republican party is on the line in the Senate race. This is a “For Whom the Bell Tolls” moment. If Cruz wins, it means that powerful Washington interests with the ability to spend far more than our home-state politicians and sugar daddys, are poised to insert themselves into Texas politics and change its course. Even Perry understands this, which is why he is all-in for Dewhurst. What is going to stop the tea party and its deep-pockets national backers from taking over Texas politics with money that comes from outside the state? What is to stop them from uniting behind another Ted Cruz-like candidate to defeat Rick Perry’s bid for reelection. This is exactly what has happened in the Senate race, and it will continue to happen in future race.

For more on the race, take a look at the Houston Chronicle, the Associated Press, the Washington Post, The Atlantic, this great discussion from NPR’s Talk of the Nation including UT professor Bruce Buchanan or the New York Times, which highlights Cruz’s star, Jonathan Krohnesque qualities:

Mr. Cruz expresses pride in his father for making it after fleeing Cuba with nothing in the 1950s, before Fidel Castro’s victory. He was recognized early as a prodigy, paid to give erudite speeches on free enterprise and Constitutional limits while still in high school.

At Princeton University he was a champion debater. He won high honors at Harvard Law and clerked for William H. Rehnquist, then the chief justice of the Supreme Court. He worked in a Washington law firm and then took federal posts in the administration of George W. Bush before returning to Texas for the appointed job of solicitor general, arguing cases before the Supreme Court.

But do the Republicans want Hispanics? Burka doesn’t seem to think so:

There is another aspect to the Dewhurst-Cruz battle, and it is the tendency of the mainstream Republicans to fail to act in their own best interests. It is stunning to me that Greg Abbott continues to harass Hispanics with Voter I.D. and purging the voter rolls: that he can’t see the damage it is doing to the party’s future. He is willing to trade long-term political gain for his party in return for short-term political gain for himself.

The tea party is an immediate threat but not a long-term one; it is a one-generation phenomenon, the last gasp of old angry uninformed white guys. Hispanics are a different story; they represent the future and without them the Republicans have no future. Does it change anyone’s thinking? Apparently not.

If anyone is looking for a Hispanic rising star, Ted Cruz isn’t the one. No, that rising star is Julian Castro, who will deliver the keynote address at the 2012 Democratic National Convention. Remember what Obama said about Texas becoming a swing state? That may well involve Castro in a statewide race.

There’s also a Democratic primary runoff for US Senate between two off candidates. KTRK has an excellent story on the combined patheticness of the candidates:

We did reach out to both campaigns for comment today, but did not get a response from either.

Campaigns that don’t jump at the chance for free media attention in the largest city in the state are . . . well, what’s a stronger word than pathetic? Sadler doesn’t seem to have a campaign but should, and no one really knows what this Yarbrough guy is about. KT has more. I hope Sadler is using this round as a come back so he can have an effective races for one of the state-level statewide offices in 2014.

The Democratic Party, both in Texas and nationally, needs rising stars like Wu and Castro.

And for anyone who read this post because they thought this post was about the November 1991 WWF Pay-Per-View “This Tuesday In Texas,” enjoy Bret Hart applying the Sharpshooter to retain the Intercontinental Title:

- Justin