February 22, 2012

Workers’ rights at Apple factories

There’s been a lot of attention paid recently to the rights of workers at Foxconn factories in China. Foxconn is one of the biggest suppliers and manufacturers of Apple iPhones and iPads. There’s been a This American Life, Mike Daisy did a whole Broadway show about Steve Jobs that includes a trenchent commentary on the working conditions in Shenzhen. Now the mighty New York Times takes a microscope to factory life (and really, workers live inside the factories, which are like small bustling cities.)

Here is the saddest and most poignant description I read:

He had been promoted quickly at Foxconn, and after just a few months was in charge of a team that maintained the machines that polished iPad cases. The sanding area was loud and hazy with aluminum dust. Workers wore masks and earplugs, but no matter how many times they showered, they were recognizable by the slight aluminum sparkle in their hair and at the corners of their eyes.

While the description is almost poetic, the “twinkling dust” can be deadly.

Dust is a known safety hazard. In 2003, an aluminum dust explosion in Indiana destroyed a wheel factory and killed a worker. In 2008, agricultural dust inside a sugar factory in Georgia caused an explosion that killed 14.

So the factory explodes, and Lai, who had moved to Chengdu to be able to afford a wedding to a beautiful nursing student, was lying on the floor of the factory.

Eventually, his family arrived. Over 90 percent of his body had been seared. “My mom ran away from the room at the first sight of him. I cried. Nobody could stand it,” his brother said. When his mother eventually returned, she tried to avoid touching her son, for fear that it would cause pain.

“If I had known,” she said, “I would have grabbed his arm, I would have touched him.”

“He was very tough,” she said. “He held on for two days.”

After Mr. Lai died, Foxconn workers drove to Mr. Lai’s hometown and delivered a box of ashes. The company later wired a check for about $150,000.

That’s not an insignificant amount. Lai made $22/day, or $6864 annually if he’s pulling the 6 day workweeks that are common, and not taking any weeks off. That’s easily a lifetime of money for his family. But it doesn’t change the fact that the process of assembling all the gadgets that we love so very much (not just Apple) is a painful and laborious one done by workers who make less in a week than the cost of said gadget.

This NYTimes story doesn’t even get into the infamous suicides at Foxconn that caused the company to put up a mesh net around its periphery. for that, go watch Mike Daisey’s The Agony and Ecstasy of Steve Jobs or listen to This American Life’s episode on the turmoil within the plants, and why some workers would rather take their lives than continue working on the assembly lines.

A majority of people don’t know where Apple makes its products, nor do they really care, according to a recent poll. So I’m glad the issue is gaining traction and getting attention, because in order for these processes to change, the consumers are the ones who have to be aware and be willing to hold Apple accountable, the way that activists held Nike and Gap accountable. Apple recently released a list of their suppliers, but they still aren’t letting activists into their plants to examine the conditions. I’m not saying we shouldn’t own cell phones and tablets, just that we should be mindful of where they come from.

–Caroline

White House Internship Opportunities for AAPI Youth

White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders

Washington, D.C.- The White House is looking for Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) interns for Summer 2012.

The White House Internship Program
From the White House: “This hands-on program is designed to mentor and cultivate today’s young leaders, strengthen their understanding of the Executive Office and prepare them for future public service opportunities. Interns are placed in various offices throughout the White House, and are given varying tasks, such as conducting research, managing incoming inquiries, attending meetings, and writing memos. Apply HERE.”

The deadline for White House Internships is January 22, 2012 for the Summer Term (5/29/12-8/10/12). Internships are available for undergraduate and graduate students, recent graduates and veterans. To learn more: http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/internships.

White House Initiative on AAPIs (WHIAAPI) Internship Program
From the Initiative: “The WHIAAPI Internship Program offers students the opportunity to work on a wide range of Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) issues, including education, health, sustainable neighborhoods, economic development, civil rights, and labor and employment. In addition to assisting with research on those topics, interns will help write policy memos and proposals, coordinate events, and conduct outreach to national and local AAPI organizations, elected officials, and ethnic media outlets. Apply HERE.”

Applications are due March 15, 2012 for the Summer Term (June through August) and May 15, 2012 for the Fall 2012 Term (August through December). Internships are available for undergraduate and graduate students. To learn more, visit www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/aapi/internships or email whitehouseaapi@ed.gov.

Asian Pacific Community Fund Paid Internships

Asian Pacific Community Fund

Paid Internships Available

The Asian Pacific Community Fund (APCF) is seeking two dynamic individuals to fill its Special Events Intern position and Scholarship Program Intern position. We are looking for individuals who are committed to the Asian and Pacific Islander community and have a passion for making a difference through resource development for APCF and its 29 Affiliate Agencies in Greater Los Angeles.
APCF was founded in 1990 as an alternative fund for donors to directly support Asian and Pacific Islander communities in need. Today, APCF is a vital link that connects donors to those in need by building a community of giving – one donor at a time. For more information on APCF and its Affiliate Agencies, please visit www.apcf.org.


Position: Special Events Intern
Length of Commitment:
January 16, 2012 – August 31, 2012
16 hours per week with additional hours required around the event date
Compensation:
$1,000 paid at the completion of the internship
Duties:
This PAID internship position provides hands-on experience working in special events coordination for an Asian American non-profit organization and is an excellent opportunity for those wishing to develop skills in non-profit fundraising which is highly sought after in the industry.
Responsibilities:

Primary
Oversee Silent Auction for fundraising event including donor research, solicitation, tracking, creation of auction displays, bid sheets, auction catalog, etc.

Secondary
Assist the Executive Director with the following:
  • Event design & production
  • Secure guests, track attendees and process payments
  • Build strategic partnerships & solicit sponsors
  • Program development
  • Coordination the day of the fundraising event
  • Follow up after the event
  • Event website and online marketing and processes
This position also allows for exposure to the Asian Pacific Community Fund’s 29 Affiliate Agencies providing services to over 250,000 people every year in 27 Asian languages plus English and Spanish in the Greater Los Angeles area.
Language Skills:
  • Must be fluent in English and have excellent writing skills.
  • Ability to speak, read & write Chinese, Japanese, Korean and/or Spanish a plus but not necessary.
Requirements:
  • College degree or active enrollment.
  • Excellent verbal and written communication skills.
  • Self starter with strong interest in the fundraising arena.
  • Ability to work independently and as a team.
  • Attention to detail is a must.
  • Intermediate/advanced skills in Microsoft Word and Excel and internet research.
  • Functional knowledge in creating websites and graphics programs a plus.
Contact Person: Kristin Cheung, Development Manager
Phone: 213-624-6400 ext. 8
Email: kcheung@apcf.org
Application Instructions:
Please email COVER LETTER, RESUME and 3 REFERENCES to
kcheung@apcf.org with subject header “Special Events Internship” or fax to 213-624-6406.
Application Deadline:
December 31, 2011 or until position is filled.

Position: Scholarship Program Intern
Length of Commitment: February 1, 2012-July 31, 2012 (16 hours/week average).
Compensation: $1,000 stipend paid at the completion of the internship
Duties: This PAID internship position provides hands-on experience overseeing the Asian Pacific Community Fund’s scholarship program. This internship is an excellent opportunity for those wishing to develop experience planning and running a program in a non-profit.
Responsibilities (may include some or all of the following):
  • Conducting outreach to Asian and Pacific Islander communities throughout California, Oregon and Washington to promote program and obtain applications
  • Write, design and create announcement and flyer
  • Assist in development and creation of scholarship application
  • Answering questions about the program and assisting with application process
  • Organizing applications as they arrive
  • Recruit, train and organize teams of readers to review applications
  • Acknowledging applicants of receipt of application
  • Notifying award winners
Skills / Qualifications:
Required:

  • Fast learner, critical thinker and ability to thrive in a fast-paced environment
  • Self-starter with strong project management and organizational skills
  • Demonstrated ability to organize and coordinate project with maturity, initiative and timeliness
  • Desire and ability to work with a diverse group of people in the Asian and Pacific Islander communities
  • Ability to work independently and in a team environment
  • Excellent verbal and written communication skills
  • Attention to detail is a must
  • Intermediate/advanced skills in Microsoft Word and Excel and Internet research
  • Ability to manage and update website content
  • College degree or active enrollment
  • Minimum of 18 years of age, US citizen or permanent resident status
  • Must have transportation to attend meetings and events throughout LA County
Preferred:
  • Understanding and familiarity of the Asian/Pacific Islander community in Los Angeles County
  • Ability to work a flexible schedule (some nights and weekends may be required)
Contact Person: Christine Ma
Phone: 213-624-6400 x6
Email: cma@apcf.org
Application Instructions: Interested applicants should send cover letter, resume and 3 references with “Scholarship Internship” in the subject line emailed or faxed to: Christine Ma, cma@apcf.org or Fax 213-624-6406. Please be sure to include ALL requested information (cover letter, resume and references).
Application Deadline: Applications will be accepted until Friday, January 6, 2012 or position is filled.

1145 Wilshire Blvd, 1st Floor | Los Angeles, CA 90017 US

How the rightwing gets progressive money to tear down teachers

Former AAA Fund blogger Lee Fang has a great investigative article up in the Nation (“How Online Learning Companies Bought America’s Schools) on how the Gates Foundation is giving conservative think tank American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) nearly half a million – $400,000 – to sponsor education reform bills at the state level. ALEC is not a friendly organization – it doesn’t promote the health and welfare of underserved communities, or anything that you might associate with the good that the Gates Foundation does. It is the main policy organizing arm of the right wing that pushes the most heinous anti-immigrant (SB 1070 clones), anti-civil rights (they push all the restrictive voter bills), anti-worker, anti-health care reform bills at the state level, and they try to do it across all the states. Basically, if a large corporation like Blue Cross Blue Shield has a bill they want to promote, they give money to ALEC to help them get state legislators to sponsor and move their bills along. 85% of their funding comes from corporations.

I can say this from first hand experience – I spent more than a year fighting anti-immigrant, anti-worker policies across the states that ALEC was pushing. And now everyone knows the terrible impact that they can have, from Arizona to Alabama.</rant>

Going back to Gates funding an anti-teacher agenda. Crooks and Liars has additional analysis:

Education for profit is lucrative and alluring, especially to people with large sums of money parked and waiting for investment in big-profit items. So when Bill Gates claims to stand for education reform in this country, I place him squarely in the category of those who stand to profit from privatized education.

Teachers are up against a wide range and nexus of for-profit education corporations, companies that make money by performing measurements of No Child Left Behind (SchoolNet is one), venture capital firms (led by KleinerPerkins), hedge funds and finance types, elected officials, and foundations (Gates, Eli Broad, Dell, etc.) which are seeking to push anti-union and anti-teacher proposals. These groups hire high-priced lobbyists to promote their agenda:

Levesque noted that reform efforts had failed because the opposition had time to organize. Next year, Levesque advised, reformers should “spread” the unions thin “by playing offense” with decoy legislation. Levesque said she planned to sponsor a series of statewide reforms, like allowing taxpayer dollars to go to religious schools by overturning the so-called Blaine Amendment, “even if it doesn’t pass…to keep them busy on that front.” She also advised paycheck protection, a unionbusting scheme, as well as a state-provided insurance program to encourage teachers to leave the union and a transparency law to force teachers unions to show additional information to the public. Needling the labor unions with all these bills, Levesque said, allows certain charter bills to fly “under the radar.”

Public sector workers have been under attack this cycle, and there’s no doubt that teachers don’t have the clout to combat these bills on their own. 

Lobbyists like Levesque have made 2011 the year of virtual education reform, at last achieving sweeping legislative success by combining the financial firepower of their corporate clients with the seeming legitimacy of privatization-minded school-reform think tanks and foundations. Thanks to this synergistic pairing, policies designed to boost the bottom lines of education-technology companies are cast as mere attempts to improve education through technological enhancements, prompting little public debate or opposition. In addition to Florida, twelve states have expanded virtual school programs or online course requirements this year. This legislative juggernaut has coincided with a gold rush of investors clamoring to get a piece of the K-12 education market. It’s big business, and getting bigger: One study estimated that revenues from the K-12 online learning industry will grow by 43 percent between 2010 and 2015, with revenues reaching $24.4 billion.

Needless to say, I don’t think online education is the main solution to our education crisis. And I’m definitely opposed to companies profiting from replacing real live teachers with video teachers. That’s not a substitute teacher, that’s a virtual teacher, as in virtually no education.

Thirteen other states have enacted laws to expand or initiate so-called school choice programs this year.

Meanwhile, ALEC has continued to slip laws written by education-tech lobbyists onto the books. In Tennessee, Republican State Representative Harry Brooks didn’t even bother changing the name of ALEC’s Virtual Public Schools Act before introducing it as his own legislation. Asked by the Knoxville News Sentinel’s Tom Humphrey where he got the idea for the bill, Brooks readily admitted that a K12 Inc. lobbyist helped him draft it. Governor Bill Haslam signed Brooks’s bill into law in May. The statute allows parents to apply nearly every dollar the state typically spends per pupil, almost $6,000 in most areas, to virtual charter schools, as long as they are authorized by the state.

It’s worse than charter schools – it’s video schools. The onslaught is coming, be forewarned and arm yourself with knowledge.

– Caroline

OWS is an opt-out movement

I have been struggling with how to define and explain Occupy Wall Street to people who ask. Is it the sunny park in front of Los Angeles City Hall where Tom Morrello played for an enthusiastic and diverse crowd of people willing to share food, materials, ideals? Is it the drum circle at Zuccotti Park (not really a park but just a patch of concrete as many such NYC parks are defined) in the shadow of 4 skyscrapers? Is it the hapa family with kids camping out at McPherson Square? Is it millions of Americans who are seeking work, from the recent college grad who has tends of thousands in loans but no way of paying them off, to the almost 60 year old small businessman who has to declare bankruptcy right before he was supposed to retire? I see Occupy Wall Street in the Asian American faces of the 99 percent, in my friends and family who have been looking for work for so long, ashamed of not being able to contribute to their families in a striving immigrant culture that doesn’t want to talk about unemployment.

Even friends who are likely to be sympathetic are frustrated by the lack of a cohesive message and goals. Broadly I think of OWS as being about addressing financial inequality. Matt Taibbi in “How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love the OWS Protests” has a whole article about how he sees OWS as being essentially opt-out, seeking an exit from the grind: “We’re all born wanting the freedom to imagine a better and more beautiful future. But modern America has become a place so drearily confining and predictable that it chokes the life out of that built-in desire.”

He admits that he didn’t get it at first, “But now, I get it. People want to go someplace for at least five minutes where no one is trying to bleed you or sell you something. It may not be a real model for anything, but it’s at least a place where people are free to dream of some other way for human beings to get along, beyond auctioned “democracy,” tyrannical commerce and the bottom line.”

He addresses his ambivalence about the cops, who are a part of the 99% (and some cops do recognize this) as a target of the OWS movement, because they are working class too.But ultimately it’s not about the cops doing their job, it’s about the decisionmakers who prioritize what crimes get prosecuted:

This is a profound statement about who law enforcement works for in this country. What happened on Wall Street over the past decade was an unparalleled crime wave. Yet at most, maybe 1,500 federal agents were policing that beat – and that little group of financial cops barely made any cases at all.

. . . People want out of this fiendish system, rigged to inexorably circumvent every hope we have for a more balanced world. They want major changes. I think I understand now that this is what the Occupy movement is all about. It’s about dropping out, if only for a moment, and trying something new, the same way that the civil rights movement of the 1960s strived to create a “beloved community” free of racial segregation. Eventually the Occupy movement will need to be specific about how it wants to change the world. But for right now, it just needs to grow. And if it wants to sleep on the streets for a while and not structure itself into a traditional campaign of grassroots organizing, it should. It doesn’t need to tell the world what it wants. It is succeeding, for now, just by being something different.

This is what is moving about Occupy Wall Street – people want change, and they are taking the time to deliberate about what changes they want to see during General Assembly. Folks are participating in the dialogue of the commons again, and they are reclaiming the commons space. People are questioning again. I actually don’t know if OWS is permanently an opt-out movement, or if the whole can even be described as such – Occupy the Polls and caucuses is happening in Iowa and New Hampshire because people till see the importance of electoral participation. Not as a be all, end all, not as a “once we elect this woman or man, s/he will create the changes that we want” but as a longer term discourse about what kind of society we want to be. Communities across America are coming back together, picking up the pieces, and strengthening our neighborhoods. We see it in upstate New York, where a community decided to build their own department store and sold shares to local residents. We see it in the tent cities across America, where people are congregating because they care again, and they care enough to join others. So in a sense, I feel that OWS is not as much opt-out as it is the pause before these disillusioned Americans opt back in, and how.

–Caroline

 

DNC calls for Minority Vendors

The Democratic National Committee is walking the walk when trying to help the 99% get jobs. It is especially trying to do appropriate outreach to firms owned by minorities, women, veterans, and others whose presence in the contracting community has not been on par with their presence in the population at large.

Last July, the DNC conducted a nationwide search to hire a Chief Diversity Officer. On October 17th, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the Democratic National Committee Convention (DNCC), and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) announced that they had hired a new Chief Diversity Officer, U.S. Cellular phone executive Greg Hinton, a well-regarded African American business leader and diversity expert.

Today, it is incumbent on Asian and Pacific Islander Americans to register our small businesses with the DNC and Democratic 2012 Convention databases so that CDO Hinton and the Democratic party can bring more APIA vendors to the attention of Democratic candidates and party organizations around the country. Registering is not a guarantee of getting more business, but not being registered is a guarantee of no business!

To register for minority contracting with the DNC, fill in their online questionnaire. To be listed for vendor opportunities for the 2012 DNC convention in Charlotte, NC, go to the convention website, click on “Register Your Business” in the Vendor Directory and follow the links.

President Obama: “I will not take no for an answer”

Editor’s Note: The message below is from Jim Messina, Campaign Manager for Obama for America.

Last night, the American Jobs Act was filibustered by Senate Republicans. There was no vote on the actual bill.

But it would have succeeded: the American Jobs Act has at least 51 votes — a clear majority — to pass the Senate. And a new poll shows that 63 percent of Americans support it, too.

Today the President recorded a message he wants you to see, laying out where we go from here in the fight for jobs.

Watch President Obama’s video — and pass it on to anyone you think should see it.

The Republicans who voted yesterday to block this bill weren’t thinking about middle-class families. In fact, at last night’s GOP debate, one of their leading candidates actually refused to say he’d extend a payroll tax cut that puts more than $1,000 in the pockets of everyday working Americans.

They might believe it’s in their political interest to oppose whatever the President proposes for the next 13 months, but we know that when it comes to jobs and restoring economic security, Americans can’t afford to wait.

The American Jobs Act would get to work now, providing incentives for businesses to hire unemployed veterans, helping hire tens of thousands of teachers, cops, and firefighters, and rebuilding and modernizing our schools, railways, bridges, and airports. Even though it’s fully paid for and made up of proposals both parties have supported, Republicans yesterday said no.

Now the President wants you to hear directly from him about what’s next.

Watch the video — and make sure your friends do, too:

http://my.barackobama.com/President-on-Jobs

Thanks,

Messina

Jim Messina
Campaign Manager
Obama for America

Each senator has a choice

Editor’s Note: The message below is from Jim Messina, campaign manager for Obama for America.

The U.S. Senate is supposed to vote on the American Jobs Act as early as tonight.

It’s a bill that will put people to work immediately, and it contains proposals that members of both parties have said in the past that they’d support.

But Senate Republicans want to block it. Not because they have a plan that creates jobs right now — not one Republican, in Congress or in the presidential race, does. They only have a political plan.

Their strategy is to suffocate the economy for the sake of what they think will be a political victory. They think that the more folks see Washington taking no action to create jobs, the better their chances in the next election. So they’re doing everything in their power to make sure nothing gets done.

There’s still time for principled Republican senators to declare their independence from this kamikaze political strategy.

Senator Mitch McConnell, the Republican leader in the Senate, needs to hear what Americans like you think.

You can reach his office at (202) 224-2541. Tell him not to let politics get in the way of creating jobs.

Will you take three minutes and call now? Then click here to let us know how it went.

If Sen. McConnell’s office says he won’t support the American Jobs Act, ask which parts he doesn’t support:

– Making sure that those who served our country can get good jobs at home by providing incentives for businesses to hire unemployed veterans?
– Preventing layoffs of teachers, cops, and firefighters, while supporting the hiring of tens of thousands more?
– Rebuilding our crumbling roads, bridges, railways, and airports with a bipartisan, public-private infrastructure bank?
– Modernizing at least 35,000 public schools in rural and urban areas?
– Providing job training for the unemployed, especially young people who have been hit especially hard?

The President has been forceful and clear: Action on jobs is desperately needed, and Congress should pass this bill right away.

And he has specifically asked those of us who agree to make sure Republican lawmakers know it.

This bill — and the simple idea that every American who works hard and plays by the rules has a fundamental right to economic security — is a big part of what we stand for as a campaign and as a movement.

There’s no good reason for Congress to delay any more — and if they do, you deserve to know why.

Call Sen. McConnell’s office. Tell him you’re watching, and you expect Republicans in the Senate to do the right thing and move forward on this bill today.

Then let us know how it went:

http://my.barackobama.com/Call-For-Jobs

Thanks,

Messina

Jim Messina
Campaign Manager
Obama for America

Occupy Wall Street

Good primer on the Occupy Wall Street movement from Ezra Klein’s Wonkbook:

The Occupy Wall Street protests are explicitly inspired by, and modeled on, the Tahrir Square protests in Egypt. And though that’s a tough act to follow, it’s clear the Occupy Wall Street protests are catching a fire all their own. The question now is what they do with it. The jockeying has already begun to suggest an agenda to the protesters — see these proposals by Mike Konczal and Nick Kristof — and, in the embrace of the activist left, to join the protesters to an agenda that already exists, much as happened with the Tea Party and the conservative movement.

We’ll see, over the next few weeks, which, if any of these paths, tempt the protesters. Up until now, the organizers have seemed to view the decentralized, inchoate nature of the protests as a strength for the nascent movement, not a weakness. The unifying idea has been drawing attention to “the 99,” not offering a concrete policy agenda. The New York Times quoted a a pep talk a woman gave to a new protester. “It’s about taking down systems, it doesn’t matter what you’re protesting,” she said. “Just protest.”

Read the full thing here.

The American Jobs Act Goes to Congress

Today could be a big day — the White House is sending the American Jobs Act to Congress. But unfortunately, even after the President’s compelling speech last week, passing the bill is still an uphill battle. Ezra Klein explains in this morning’s Wonk Book:

An ideal political process would work something like this: Congressional Republicans would take a look at the American Jobs Act and the forthcoming offsets. If they had specific concerns about some of the jobs proposals, they would propose alternatives. If they worried the offsets weren’t sufficient, they would ask for more options. As the two parties agree on both the need to create jobs and reduce the deficit, this should be fertile ground for a compromise.

And maybe it will be. But that can only happen if the question is, “what’s the best jobs package?” Unfortunately, as that senior House aide suggests, the question is likelier to be, “what’s the best strategy for winning the White House in 2012?” And the answer to that question is to further the impression that Obama is a tax-and-borrow liberal who can’t get things done in Washington and doesn’t have a sound plan for the economy. Working with the president on a bipartisan jobs-and-deficit-reduction plan makes him look like, well, a good president. And good presidents often get reelected.