February 22, 2012

Don’t Give Idiots a Microphone

OHN GURZINSKI/AFP/GETTY IMAGES; NED DISHMAN/NBAE VIA GETTY IMAGES / Floyd Mayweather's Twitter comments on Jeremy Lin (r.) are bigoted and short-sighted.

I’ll avoid politicizing the LINsanity because inevitable articles like “Commentary: Five Things Republicans Can Learn From Jeremy Lin” and “What the GOP Can Learn From Jeremy Lin” (reprint here) threaten to throw him onto the third rail of popularity.

I’ll also avoid repeating all the thoughtful to eloquent commentary out there, the personal sighs of relief, the media stereotypes, the religion of Jeremy Lin (as interesting as it is for my other favorite topic here), his complicated heritage, a wistful history of Asian-Americans in pro sports, if race matters, model minorities, the weight of history and the weight of fame, the heights of inspiration, the sense of shared heritage and identity, Yao Ming’s eloquent and humble reflection, and the importance of it all.

I instead go after Floyd Mayweather’s bigoted Tweet about Jeremy Lin:

Jeremy Lin is a good player but all the hype is because he’s Asian. Black players do what he does every night and don’t get the same praise.

What a Twit of a Tweet. Indeed, NY Knicks’ Jeremy Lin is Mr. Big Shot while Floyd Mayweather is just another Twitter twit (and more racist Tweets abound with supporters around). More than a Twit, he’s a publically tolerated racist. Such racism is what happens when you give any old idiot a microphone. Think Rush Limbaugh or any of his kind. Plus, you get bad candidates galore with no fundamental grasp on government masquerading as government official-wanna-be’s, personal flaws masquerading as religious conviction, dumb ideas masquerading as party line policies, and opinions masquerading as news. Hoekstra and his kind are no flukes. We’ll get more like them as long as racists have a microphone.

– Richard Chen

Related: Pete Hoekstra’s Racist Superbowl Ad, DNC AAPI Leaders on Hoekstra Ad, AAA-Fund Condemns Racist Superbowl Ad, Question of the Week: LinSanity, Hyphen magazine: Happy VaLINtine’s Day

Tong/Lin 2016?

William Tong Jeremy Lin

AP/The Huffington Post   Posted: 02/16/2012 4:22 pm

Will having a sports superstar like Jeremy Lin help Asian Americans get more political respect?  U.S. Senate candidate (and AAA-Fund endorsee) William Tong thinks so (via AP/HuffPost):

HARTFORD, Conn. — As a U.S. Senate candidate from Connecticut, William Tong doesn’t have major, state-wide name recognition like his two main rivals for the Democratic nomination. But the son of Chinese immigrants has picked up supporters from across the country as the only Asian-American candidate for Senate this year in the continental U.S.

With only 3.8 percent of Connecticut’s population identified as Asian, it’s unclear how much the degree of celebrity Tong has developed within the Asian-American community will translate into a possible victory.

The 38-year-old state representative and self-proclaimed political underdog hopes his story of growing up in his family’s Chinese restaurant, working nights and weekends washing dishes, cooking and waiting tables before graduating from an Ivy League university and law school, will touch non-Asian voters as well because it is “a universal story” about living the American dream, he said.

“My story resonates with everybody,” Tong said. “Everybody owns a piece of the same story.”

Gautam Dutta, executive director of the Asian American Action Fund, a political action committee that contributed $1,000 to Tong’s campaign, said Tong is a particularly compelling candidate for Asian supporters because he has already been elected in a legislative district that does not have a large Asian population and has successfully connected with non-Asian voters.

Dutta said there is sometimes a perception in the Asian community and within other minority groups that a minority candidate doesn’t have a chance of winning without a large pool of minority voters supporting them at the polling booth.

“He’s reached out to everyone and they believe in him,” Dutta said of Tong.

“It’s not every day that you have a viable Asian candidate running for U.S. Senate,” Dutta added. “He’s definitely in the trail-blazer category.”

****

Tong, who, if elected would be the first Chinese-American to hold a U.S. Senate seat, has not been shy about discussing his ethnicity on the campaign trail. On Thursday, Tong linked his message of being an underdog fighting for the American dream for everyday people to the Asian-American basketball phenomenon Jeremy Lin of the New York Knicks. In a fundraising e-mail to supporters, Tong points out how Lin, also the son of Chinese-American immigrants, was an underdog, with no one willing to give him a shot.

“When somebody finally gave him a chance, he took the NBA by storm. He’s arrived, but he got here with a decade of hard work and confidence against the odds. He’s the underdog who made it. He’s living the American Dream,” Tong wrote. “The dream I’ve lived, the dream Jeremy Lin is living, is the dream we can all live. But we have to fight for it.”

We’re proud of two leaders who have realized the American Dream.

– Gautam Dutta

Hyphen magazine: Happy VaLINtine’s Day

Ed. Note: The below is a repost of Hyphen magazine‘s “Happy VaLINtine’s Day“, the fifth in our collaboration with Hyphen Magazine. See past entries from this collaboration.

InterVarisity Linsanity Happy Valentine's

Dear Jeremy Lin,

Hi. My name is Terry K. Park. I’m Mr. Hyphen 2011. That probably means nothing to you, since you’re Mr. NBA 2012, King of New York, Emperor of the Twitterverse. But I just wanted to introduce myself to you, from one representative of the Asian American community to another, so you don’t think I’m some random crazy person. To be honest, though, I’ve become a little crazy. A little insane, actually. Okay I’ll say it.

You’ve made me Linsane.

Happy VaLINtine’s Day.

Wait! Please keep reading. I know you’ve been getting a lot of love lately. From the press. From Spike Lee. From Mike D’Antoni (and rightly so — he owes you big time). And I read an article suggesting 10 New York celebrity women for you to date. But since you’re in Toronto tonight, and no one attractive lives there, I wanted to make sure you had a Valentine’s Day card to warm your heart, from someone who really appreciates you, who’s been following you since your Harvard days.

Not literally following you. Don’t worry. I have a life.

And that life, before I was infected with Linsanity, consisted of being insane for the Utah Jazz.

The Utah Jazz? I know. It sounds weird. Allow me to explain why the Jazz meant so much to me, and why you, now, mean so much to me, on this day of VaLINtine’s.

When I was seven years old, my family moved to Salt Lake City from San Jose, CA. A couple months after I arrived, my new friends and I walked to the neighborhood 7-Eleven and saw, in the parking lot, a massive black pick-up truck. We walked into the store and saw, standing at the register, a massive black pick-up truck of a man. My friends pushed me toward him and then hid in the candy aisle. Stumbling, I looked in front of me and saw cowboy boots. I looked up, and up, and up, and a few minutes later when I saw his face, I asked, “Are you Karl Malone?” He craned his neck down and said to the midget Asian boy with the bowl cut, “Yeah.” I asked, “Can I have your autograph?” “Yeah.” As my friends finally joined me to get their autographs, Malone reached into his wallet, handed me a crisp five dollar bill, and said, “Here, go buy yourself a Big Gulp.” I gulped.

Soon after, Malone, along with his perennial pick-and-roll partner, John Stockton, adorned my bedroom wall. I quickly grew to love — obsess over — the Jazz. Not because their star power forward paid me five dollars for my allegiance, but because the team’s presence made me feel like I belonged in a state where I felt incredibly, desperately, alone. I could watch Jazz telecasts and be a loyal Jazzman like everyone else, no longer a short Korean American kid constantly betrayed by the pungent food in his fridge, the heavy accent in his immigrant mother’s English, and the non-white, non-Mormon face in his bathroom mirror. I had no one to cheer for on the TV screen who looked like me (I didn’t play tennis, so Michael Chang didn’t count), so I might as well cheer for the local team and their superstars: one black, one white. But it wasn’t enough just to cheer anonymously for the Jazz; I wanted to prove I belonged by excelling on several athletic fields, including the basketball court.

I thought that if I patterned my game after Stockton’s pass-first, team-first style of play, I would pass. Not quite. Even though I played well for my Junior Jazz teams, was selected to several all-star teams at the basketball camp of University of Utah Coach Rick Majerus, I felt that I was either hypervisible as a racial oddity or an invisible man whose skills were ignored. One particular moment at Coach Majerus’s basketball camp dramatized these two feelings simultaneously. We were all seated on the floor of the Huntsmen Center while Coach Majerus demonstrated how to set a solid pick for a pick and roll: “When you set a pick on your man, don’t take Chinese steps” — taking clipped, hesitant, pitter-patter steps — “take real steps” — taking long, more assured strides. Immediately, everyone in the entire arena turned their heads and looked at the only Asian American kid in the entire basketball camp. Yup, me.

Little did I know that someone about my height, with my complexion, and with much better skills, had probably felt much more alone, on that same court, in that same city, in that same state. In 1944, as Japanese Americans were interned at camps like Topaz in Utah, Wat Misaka, a 5’7’’, 150 lb Japanese American point guard from Ogden, led the University of Utah to their only NCAA championship at Madison Square Garden. Three years later, Misaka led the underdog Utes back to MSG for the title game of the more prestigious National Invitational Tournament against the University of Kentucky, coached by the legendary Adolph Rupp. Stated the New York Times on March 25, 1947: “Little Wat Misaka, American born of Japanese descent, was a cute fellow intercepting passes and making the night miserable for Kentucky.” That “cute fellow” held Ralph Beard, arguably the best college player that year, to one single point. Several days later, Wat was drafted in the first round by the Knicks — the first Asian American to play in the NBA.

If I had known then about Misaka and his heroics, maybe I would’ve felt less alone and more proud to be Asian in Utah and in the US. But I didn’t. And so, as I later moved to Korea, to New York, and back to California, I maintained my love for the Jazz, while scouring the internet for news of any Asian American sports stars, and finding very little. Even as I entered the academic world and understood that my shame that day at Majerus’s camp and my burning desire to find an Asian American male sports star indicated my problematic investment in dominant modes of masculinity, I still yearned for an athletic face and body that looked like mine, who didn’t take “Chinese steps,” but manly “Majerus” steps.

That’s why I was so glad when I found out that the star of Harvard’s basketball team was an athletic 6’3’’, 205 lb Chinese American point guard from Palo Alto. I loved watching YouTube clips of your dunks against UConn and your drives against Georgetown. I was a little disappointed (though not surprised) when you went undrafted in 2010, but was ecstatic when you outplayed John Wall in the summer league and signed with the Golden State Warriors. I felt bad for you that the Oracle Arena crowd erupted whenever you entered the game and touched the ball (even though I did just that when I watched you play against my Jazz — sorry), and even worse when it was clear that you would never get regular playing time behind Monta Ellis and Stephen Curry. I was sad to hear you were cut by the Warriors and Rockets at the beginning of this season, but glad that the Knicks gave you a chance.

And then, last week, playing against the New Jersey Nets and their star point guard, Deron Williams (whom I used to cheer for when he played for my Jazz), you were finally freed from the end of the bench to score a shocking 25 points and 7 assists in a Knicks win… and I couldn’t believe my eyes or my ears, as the famously fickle MSG crowd chanted “Jeremy Lin” in the same arena where, almost sixty five years before, they chanted “Wat Misaka.” Your next game, to prove that you weren’t a one-game wonder, was against my Jazz. I picked up my good friend Taiyo Na, musician/actor and a native New Yorker, and we watched the game at The Go Sports Bar in Old Oakland. At that bar was fellow native New Yorker Eddie Kochiyama, son of legendary activist Yuri Kochiyama. Taiyo invited him to our table. We then watched you take Chinese steps all over the court to the tune of 28 points, 8 assists, and another improbable Knicks victory. For the first time in my life, I rooted against the Jazz. For the first time in my life, I had someone to root for.

Thanks, Jeremy.
Candy Hearts and Jump Shots,
Terry

Pete Hoekstra’s Racist Superbowl Ad

Ed. Note: The AAA-Fund Condemns Racist Superbowl Ad as do I personally, apart from my official capacities here.

There’s already a billion posts out there about the outrage so I’m not going to re-type them up when I can save my time and labor and just link to

  1. Super Bowl ‘China’ ad from Pete Hoekstra panned by bloggers, puts him into hot water, cited as racist
  2. I’m not sure the idiots who’d vote for such a guy would have enough education or intelligence to understand that Hoekstra‘s message is bad for Michigan’s economy.
  3. Emabarass the GOP’s usual racism. It works for them so they do it. Black ministers know this all too well. It’s time we learned from them and not have history repeat itself before we smarten up and waken up. I’m not waiting around for Asian-Americans to “get it”: this is racism.
  4. It’s bad political strategy, for those so entrenched inside the political game machine of numbers and strategy/policy that they can only understand it from their insider’s lingo/viewpoint.
  5. Hoekstra Super Bowl ad a slippery slope toward Asian-bashing?. No kidding, conservative idiots at CSR, it is Asian bashing and isn’t the start of it either. Amazing how idiotic headline writers are.
  6. Expose the identity of the dumb and/or racist Asian actress who did that ad using Internet justice so we know what went wrong when she agreed to do that ad.
  7. Know this is far more important and threatening of an issue than the higher placed news ranking of that other “political” Superbowl ad that is getting more press, the Bizarre Republican Freakout Over the Clint Eastwood Superbowl Ad. Probably because it’s less risky for the mass media to cover.

Now for something that we specialize in here at the AAA-Fund: action.

  1. Demand an apology. Write a letter to a newspaper, to the creeper himself, to his campaign staff (who’re also to blame but who shall remain nameless), and to those who donate to his campaign who enable him. If you’re loathe to write something from scratch then sigh a petition online. You can’t get lazier than that. Can you?
  2. Run for Congress. Or at least help those who do. As Jay Chen says

    … when people like you and I do not get involved in the political process, then people like Pete Hoekstra do.

  3. Many other like his kind running for Congress include Rep. Ed Royce (CA), Rep. Jim Moran (VA), and many more in a district near you. You need to know what you want to do for a campaign and then go do it. Or !
  4. Defund his campaign. If that means supporting not his Democratic rivals but hos rivals in the Republican primary, Clark Durant and Gary Glenn, then so be it. The racist must never be allowed into political office to represent his constituents. It seems they’re racists too, but rednecks, don’t wonder “why they hate us because you hated them first. Real Christian of you. Anyways, for us educated folks, send your time and money to where it counts. Perhaps a list of non-racist leaders will help?

To dispel some of the usual conspircy theories especially popular with less gave his fee all to charity.

A final word of warning to you lazy folk taking no action, there’s real harm to you and Asian-Americans if we don’t stop such racists. Step. Adocate. Take action.

– Richard Chen

AAA-Fund Urges SF Leaders to Keep Ranked Choice Voting

707 H St. NW, 2nd Floor
Washington, DC 20001

February 6, 2012

The Honorable Ed Lee, David Chiu, and the San Francisco Board of Supervisors
San Francisco City Hall
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102

Re: Ranked Choice Voting

Dear Mayor Lee, President Chiu, and the Board of Supervisors:

Asian American Action Fund strongly supports keeping and improving San Francisco’s Ranked Choice Voting system (RCV), because it has leveled the playing field for all of the City’s diverse communities. For this reason, we strongly support the current effort to strengthen RCV, and staunchly oppose any effort to weaken or repeal RCV.

As you know, Asian Americans comprise one-third of the City’s residents. Since 2000, AAA-Fund, a national political organization (aaa-fund.com), has given Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders a powerful voice in the political process. Towards that end, we help elect worthy leaders who care about the needs and priorities of the Asian American community and the community-at-large.

Of great importance to us, RCV has made it possible for Asian Americans and other emerging communities to elect representatives of their choice – a precious right guaranteed not only by the U.S. and California Voting Rights Acts, but the U.S. and California Constitutions.

Before the City adopted RCV, Asian American voter turnout tended to drop precipitously during the December runoff election. As a result, candidates like Michael Yaki and Mabel Teng lost the runoff election after leading comfortably in the primary election.

After the City adopted Ranked Choice Voting (RCV), Asian American representation in City government has more than doubled, from three to seven of the 17 seats for both citywide office and the Board of Supervisors.

By enabling residents to vote in a single November election, RCV has maximized voter participation across all of the City’s diverse communities. For this reason, we staunchly oppose any effort to move any part of the City’s elections to another date, whether it be September or June.

Please feel free to contact us (415.236.2048; info@aaa-fund.org) if we may be of any further assistance. Thank you for your time and attention.

Sincerely,

Gautam Dutta

Gautam Dutta, Esq.
Executive Director

Muppets Have a Dangerously Liberal Agenda Hating America And Promoting Socialism

When I read “Miss Piggy and Kermit the Frog take aim at Fox News” after being accused of touting a “dangerously liberal agenda“, I found it hard to believe that even kids shows have now been politicized, but leave it to the media geniuses at Fox News to do so. Naturally, whatever it takes to garner attention and media supremacy is self-justifying.

Too bad Fox News’ fans won’t get it because they’ll reflexively react defensively to what they see as providing them the brand of brainwashing that self-justifies their own views, similarly to how they shop around for Christian sects which best agree with their degree of literalness, racism, orthodoxy, and narrow-minded world hating. Too bad that’s the GOP Christian worldview that is not quite what was originally Christianity. The old dangers about ideology and self-justifying arguments fail to save us from the ridiculousness that is this news story.

– Richard Chen

The Case for Write-in Voting

Ed. Note:  This piece was first published in Fox and Hounds.

Voter Voice

Michael Feinstein

By

Co-chair of the Green Party of the United States and a former Mayor and City Councilman in Santa Monica, Calif.
Monday, January 23rd, 2012

A bill about to be passed by the Legislature – AB 1413 – would rob us of our right to vote for write-in candidates, a right we’ve enjoyed and exercised since California statehood in 1850.

With such a major change, one would assume it’s imminent passage is the culmination of a long public process, where the proposed change has been publicly vetted, with broad participation by civic and good government groups in debates, public forums, op/eds and talk shows.

But AB1413 hasn’t gone through such a process. Instead it’s come through the back door in a “gut and amend” bill, gutted a few days before the end of the August 2011 legislative session and now back for a quick ‘emergency’ 2/3 vote so it can go into effect immediately.

AB1413 is being pushed hard by the County Clerks, because it addresses ballot-printing requirements they believe could create an unnecessary burden and significantly increase election costs. Great, let’s address this. But there is no reason to mix such a technical fix with such a profound voting rights issue.

Where is this coming from?

There are currently both state and federal lawsuits challenging Senate Bill 6 (SB6); a federal appeals court will soon hear the federal lawsuit (Chamness v. Bowen). SB6 was the implementing statute for Proposition 14, which created the jungle primary/top two general election process for California and is slated to be tried for the first time this year.

The authors of Proposition 14 specifically avoided putting the write-in question on the ballot before the people, by hiding it in SB6. What SB6 says is that even though voters’ ballots include a space to cast write-ins, such votes won’t be counted! This violates our state constitution, which guarantees the right for everyone to have his or her vote counted. This is one of the main points of both lawsuits.

But instead of eliminating the portion of SB6 that deprives us of our ability to cast write-in votes and thus protecting our right to have our votes counted, AB1413 would get rid of the ability to cast write-ins entirely — and do so without meaningful public debate.

This dark way of doing politics is exactly how we got Proposition 14 in the first place. Proposition 14 was placed on the ballot (and SB6 approved by the legislature at the same time) between 3:40 am and 6:55 am, in February 2009 – fifteen months before Proposition 14 appeared on the ballot. This was in response to political extortion by then State Senator Abel Maldonado, who named that as his price to give the legislature the final ‘yes’ vote it needed to reach 2/3 to approve that year’s eight months’ overdue state budget.

Whether one cares or not about write-in voting, good government demands that the people have a say before Sacramento makes such a radical change to our election laws. At a minimum this proposed change should’ve been introduced in a regular bill to allow for months of public hearings. More appropriately, if the legislature truly believes that Californians should lose their right to write-in voting, it should put that question before us via the initiative process and let the people decide.

But for the immediate present, with the County Clerks pushing hard for passage before the end of the month, the Assembly should amend AB1413 to ensure that voters can continue to vote for write-in candidates, and send it back amended to the Senate, which passed it in its present form last week.

Who would oppose this? One of the three listed supporters of AB1413 is the mis-named ‘Californians to Defend the Open Primary’, a San Rafael-based non-profit ‘educational’ organization funded by the same large California corporations and individual billionaire that funded Proposition 14.

Without disclosing their reasons, these “Defenders” of democracy have pushed hard for Californian’s write-in option to be taken away.  Why?

Perhaps jungle primary supporters oppose write-in voting because they want to limit – not encourage – competition. One only has to look as recently as the November 2010 US Senate election in Alaska, where Lisa Murkowski was elected via write-ins after voters decided that neither the Democratic nor Republican nominees were acceptable. Such a popular outcome would’ve been forbidden under SB6. Here in California, voters elected two members to the US House and one to the US Senate via write-ins between 1930 and 1983.

By contrast, the absence of write-in votes gives the misleading appearance of public embrace for such limited options, because there is no way for voters to register their differences or dissent.

But even without the Top Two, AB1413 is still a bad idea. Californians have successfully used the write-in option for 161 years. In some cases, it’s been a democratic safety valve for voters who don’t agree with the choices before them. In others, it allows the system itself to adapt to changing issues and circumstances by allowing new candidates into our extraordinarily long election process. What if a major new issue arises during the fall that has no champion, or if a candidate falls gravely ill or is convicted of a crime days before the November election?

By ensuring our right to choose a candidate of our choice, write-in votes protect our fundamental right to vote. There has been no evidence that the presence of the write-in option is hurting our democracy. By contrast, it gives voice to voters that don’t feel they have one.

Whether to do away with write-in voting is an important choice that must be made by the voter, not the Legislature.  Let’s hope Sacramento makes the right call and preserves this fundamental right of democracy.

– Michael Feinstein

A Kardashian Question

Does Mitt Romney watch the Kardashians?

– Gautam Dutta

Top Lawyer Appointed to Influential Court

PRESS RELEASE

APABA APPLAUDS THE APPOINTMENT OF ADVISORY BOARD MEMBER HOLLY FUJIE TO THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT

For immediate release:  December 28, 2011

Contact:  Christina Yang at (213) 229-5149 or christina.t.yang@gmail.com

Los Angeles, CA – The Asian Pacific American Bar Association (APABA) of Los Angeles County (www.apaba.org) applauds the appointment of APABA Advisory Board member Holly J. Fujie to the Los Angeles Superior Court.  APABA graciously thanks Governor Edmund G. Brown, Jr. for the appointment.

“APABA is proud to have endorsed Holly, and to have pushed for such an eminently qualified applicant for appointment to the state judiciary,” stated Edmond Sung, president of APABA.  For the last twelve years, she has been a shareholder at Buchalter, Nemer, APC.  She is an expert in insurance and surety industry related litigation, and has been named a Southern California Super Lawyer from 2004-2011, one of the “Top 100 Lawyers” by the Los Angeles Daily Journal, and one of the “Top 50 Women Lawyers in Southern California.”  In 2009, Ms. Fujie was elected to membership in the prestigious American Law Institute.  She graduated, at the age of 22, from the University of California, Berkeley (Boalt Hall) School of Law.

“Holly Fujie truly personifies the best of our profession.  She has a fierce commitment to increasing access to legal services for the underserved, an unwavering dedication to diversity, and an immense passion for justice and equality,” stated Christina Yang, co-Chair of the Public Appointments and Judicial Endorsements Committee.  In her various leadership positions, such as President of the State Bar of California, Board member of the Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles, President of the Chancery Club, and Chair of the Board at Bet Tzedek Legal Services, Ms. Fujie has tirelessly sought to better our profession.  For her efforts, she has been bestowed the “Trailblazer” Award from the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association, the “Distinguished Advocate for Diversity” Award from the Philippine American Bar Association, the Public Service Award of the Japanese American Bar Association, and the “Breaking the Glass Ceiling” Award from the Leadership Institute for Women of Color Attorneys in Law and Business.

Ms. Fujie’s appointment is celebrated and rejoiced by all corners of the Los Angeles legal community, especially the Asian Pacific American community, for whom she has been a role model and advocate.

###

Libertarian & Green Party Candidates Seek to Join Top Two Primary Case

Ed. Note:  From our friends at BusinessandElectionLaw.com.

Libertarian and Green Party Candidates Seek to Join Top Two Primary Case

Green and Libertarian candidates and voters have asked to join California’s Top Two Primary lawsuit, because party primaries could be restored for the looming 2012 statewide election.

Charles Richardson and David Steinman, who respectively belong to the Libertarian and Green Parties, will run for Congress in the 2012 statewide election.  Randi Clausen and Andrew Arnold, who respectively belong to the Green and Libertarian Parties, intend to vote for them in the 2012 statewide election.

Steinman, Richardson, Arnold, and Clausen seek to immediately join the Top Two Primary lawsuit, because it could restore their right to participate in their respective party’s primary.

Previously, California elected its federal and state leaders through a party-primary system.  During the June primary election, parties like the Libertarian and Green Parties had the constitutional right to nominate candidates for the November general election.

On January 1, 2011, Proposition 14 and Senate Bill 6 eliminated California’s party-primary system.  Under the new Top Two Primary system, all federal and state candidates would square off against one another in the June 5, 2012 primary election.  The top two votegetters, regardless of party, would then advance to the November 6, 2012 general election.

If the Court rules that Proposition 14 is unenforceable, California’s former party-primary system will likely be restored.  That is, parties like the Green Party and the Libertarian Party will regain the right to nominate candidates for the 2012 general election.

Click here for a copy of the Motion to Intervene filed by Richardson, Steinman, Clausen and Arnold.  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is expected to rule on this matter shortly.