February 22, 2012

Twitter more addictive than alcohol, cigarettes

Apparently I’m not the only one who is super addicted to Twitter.

From the Atlantic Wire:

Twitter is harder to resist than alcohol and cigarettes. Less fun and more addictive … a sad combination. Not that we don’t enjoy some Twitter time, but it’s fun as a work distraction, not as a Saturday night activity. Alas, looking at BlackBerry users, researchers found they desired doing Internet things more than than they wanted to imbibe tobacco, alcohol, and coffee — things that are physically addictive. The researchers have an explanation that makes the whole thing a tad less depressing. “Desires for media may be comparatively harder to resist because of their high availability and also because it feels like it does not ‘cost much’ to engage in these activities, even though one wants to resist,” explains Wilhelm Hofmann.

Workers’ rights at Apple factories

There’s been a lot of attention paid recently to the rights of workers at Foxconn factories in China. Foxconn is one of the biggest suppliers and manufacturers of Apple iPhones and iPads. There’s been a This American Life, Mike Daisy did a whole Broadway show about Steve Jobs that includes a trenchent commentary on the working conditions in Shenzhen. Now the mighty New York Times takes a microscope to factory life (and really, workers live inside the factories, which are like small bustling cities.)

Here is the saddest and most poignant description I read:

He had been promoted quickly at Foxconn, and after just a few months was in charge of a team that maintained the machines that polished iPad cases. The sanding area was loud and hazy with aluminum dust. Workers wore masks and earplugs, but no matter how many times they showered, they were recognizable by the slight aluminum sparkle in their hair and at the corners of their eyes.

While the description is almost poetic, the “twinkling dust” can be deadly.

Dust is a known safety hazard. In 2003, an aluminum dust explosion in Indiana destroyed a wheel factory and killed a worker. In 2008, agricultural dust inside a sugar factory in Georgia caused an explosion that killed 14.

So the factory explodes, and Lai, who had moved to Chengdu to be able to afford a wedding to a beautiful nursing student, was lying on the floor of the factory.

Eventually, his family arrived. Over 90 percent of his body had been seared. “My mom ran away from the room at the first sight of him. I cried. Nobody could stand it,” his brother said. When his mother eventually returned, she tried to avoid touching her son, for fear that it would cause pain.

“If I had known,” she said, “I would have grabbed his arm, I would have touched him.”

“He was very tough,” she said. “He held on for two days.”

After Mr. Lai died, Foxconn workers drove to Mr. Lai’s hometown and delivered a box of ashes. The company later wired a check for about $150,000.

That’s not an insignificant amount. Lai made $22/day, or $6864 annually if he’s pulling the 6 day workweeks that are common, and not taking any weeks off. That’s easily a lifetime of money for his family. But it doesn’t change the fact that the process of assembling all the gadgets that we love so very much (not just Apple) is a painful and laborious one done by workers who make less in a week than the cost of said gadget.

This NYTimes story doesn’t even get into the infamous suicides at Foxconn that caused the company to put up a mesh net around its periphery. for that, go watch Mike Daisey’s The Agony and Ecstasy of Steve Jobs or listen to This American Life’s episode on the turmoil within the plants, and why some workers would rather take their lives than continue working on the assembly lines.

A majority of people don’t know where Apple makes its products, nor do they really care, according to a recent poll. So I’m glad the issue is gaining traction and getting attention, because in order for these processes to change, the consumers are the ones who have to be aware and be willing to hold Apple accountable, the way that activists held Nike and Gap accountable. Apple recently released a list of their suppliers, but they still aren’t letting activists into their plants to examine the conditions. I’m not saying we shouldn’t own cell phones and tablets, just that we should be mindful of where they come from.

–Caroline

Korea’s Online Clash

(originally published at Zocalo Public Square)

South Korea is among the world’s most wired places. Seoul metro passengers stream KBO baseball games on their tablet PCs while native search companies Naver and Daum provide high-quality street views that outmatch the Google equivalent. High technology is at the heart of Korean industry and society; the country is renowned for its high-speed fiber-optic Internet connections, ubiquitous Wi-Fi networks, and relatively cheap unlimited data plans. And few nations have grappled as forcefully with the trade-offs between online security and online anonymity, having ditched the latter to strengthen the former. At least that was the theory before the bargain backfired spectacularly over the summer.

In late July, a malicious code infiltrated South Korea’s major portal site Nate and the social networking service Cyworld, the “Facebook of Korea,” granting cyber attackers with an IP address originating in China access to some 35 million netizens’ personal information. The attack, allegedly directed by North Korea, was the largest in the South’s history, more severe than the hacks in April that exposed the personal information of 425,000 Hyundai Capital users and paralyzed Nonghup’s banking system for days.

The attack on Cyworld shocked Koreans in a way that no online security breach has ever shocked Americans. This was not akin to a case of hackers gaining access to your embarrassing Facebook Chat conversations with an ex-girlfriend or tagged photos of you at last year’s New Year’s Eve party, or someone stumbling upon discrete information about one firm’s customers. No, thanks to Korea’s Real Name Verification and Cyber Insult Laws, enacted in 2008, those hacking Korea from outside made off with a treasure chest of critical information. July’s hackers accessed 35 million Internet users’ names, cellphone numbers, e-mail addresses, social security numbers, passwords, occupations, office numbers, and blood types. In a country of 48 million that is still technically at war, the idea that nearly 100 percent of the online population’s private data is now in the hands of the enemy is more than a little disconcerting. [Read more...]