May 17, 2012

Judicial Elections: The Case for Sanjay Kumar

Should judges be elected?  While federal judges are appointed (and enjoy lifetime tenure), a number of states (like Texas and California) force judges to either run for election (to join the bench) or for a “retention election” (to stay on the bench).

No system is perfect.  While appointing judges has its flaws, it at least allows for a candidate’s credentials to be scrutinized by several committees — both before and after he or she has been nominated.

But what if judges are elected?  Does the normal voter like you or me have the ability or time to examine the credentials of a dozen (or sometimes more) judicial candidates?  And since judicial candidates can’t campaign like other candidates (after all, they are not allowed to make promises on how they will rule), does that give candidates with a more mainstream-sounding name an unfair advantage?

Take the case of Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Sanjay Kumar, an outstanding jurist who has not only excelled as a trial judge, but has been repeatedly invited to “pinch hit” for the California Court of Appeal.

Next month, Judge Kumar (who has been endorsed by the Los Angeles Times) must win a retention election to keep his job, and one other candidate seeks his seat.  As it turns out, his opponent (Kim Smith) was rated “not qualified” when he last ran for judge two years back.  But that brings up two problems.  First, voters might not be aware of Smith’s lack of credentials.  Furthermore, they may be reluctant for someone with a “foreign sounding” name.

To be sure, candidates have been elected with “funny names” (see Barack Obama).  However, judicial elections are quite a different ball of wax — because hardly any voters have heard of any of the candidates.  Making matters even more difficult, LA County judicial candidates must reach 4 million voters — an extremely expensive proposition.

There are no easy answers to this problem.  Personally, I would favor (1) giving state judges longer terms, and (2) giving the Legislature and the Governor limited authority not to renew a judge’s term — but only if a judge has acted unprofessionally or abused his or her power.

Meanwhile, AAA-Fund of California strongly endorses Sanjay Kumar for Los Angeles Superior Court.  If you live in Los Angeles County, please vote for him on June 5.

– Gautam Dutta

Hyphen Magazine: Politics: How Jay Chen Thinks He Can Get to D.C.

Ed. Note: The below is a repost of Hyphen magazine‘s “Politics: How Jay Chen Thinks He Can Get to D.C.“, the 6th in our collaboration with Hyphen Magazine. See past entries from this collaboration.

Jay Chen for Congress

With the 2012 election heating up, I caught up with Jay Chen, a Taiwanese American Democrat running for Congress in California’s newly drawn 39th District, covering parts of Los Angeles, San Bernardino, and Orange counties.


At age 34, Chen sits as president of the board of education in the Hacienda-La Puente school district. He owns a commercial real estate business, and also trains with the Navy Reserves one weekend every month, where he serves as an Intelligence Officer. Graduating with honors from Harvard University, Chen worked for a period at the global consulting firm Bain and Company.


With a 41-33 voter registration ratio in favor of Republicans, California’s 39th district is viewed by national party committees as “solidly Republican.” Chen’s opponent, incumbent Rep. Ed Royce (R), has served 19 years in the House and is a member of the Tea Party Caucus.


I asked Jay about his campaign and how he plans to win against a hard-line Republican in a historically conservative district.

You used to work for Ed Royce, your opponent. Can you tell us a little about that?


I was an intern in Ed Royce’s office right before I started my freshman year at Harvard. I was placed there by the Taiwanese American Citizens League.


I answered the phones, took people on tours of the capitol, typical intern stuff. His political views were not that apparent to me back then. I even met with him a couple of years ago when I was doing a shadowing fellowship to get to know more about Congress through APAICS (Asian Pacific American Institute for Congressional Studies).


Has Royce ever referenced you as his former intern?


You know, I think he’s kind of embarrassed, because obviously he didn’t do a very good job of bringing me over to the dark side, since I’m now Democrat.


What are your major policy differences with Royce?



On Wall Street vs. Main Street


He [Royce] sits on the House Financial Services Committee. He supported the deregulation of the banks which allowed them to take the big risks they took, which eventually led to the collapse and the bailouts. He’s going to say he voted against the bailouts… Fine, but he voted for dismantling the regulations and getting rid of Sarbanes-Oxley [Act] so that banks could get into a position to get bailed out. So it’s kind of a hollow statement to say, “oh well I voted against the bailouts.”


With regard to Main Street, he’s voted against the payroll tax cut, he’s voted against a lot of initiatives that would have helped the middle class, the working class, and small businesses.


On War


Royce was in favor of Iraq and Afghanistan wars. He voted against bringing the troops home even when Obama said we were ready to end the Iraq war.


My view has always been against the Iraq war. I think it was a terrible thing to do.


With that said, I joined the Navy Reserves three years ago when we were still mired in the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, because as much as I disagree with it, I still think we need good people fighting these wars. You break it, you buy it.


I think it’s important that the people who are making decisions about sending the country to war have some skin in the game. Very few folks in Congress do. You know, Ed Royce has never served. Yet, he is completely fine with telling other peoples’ sons and daughters to go risk their lives. I think that’s wrong. I could be called to duty at any time, and I would gladly do it.


On Immigration


Ed Royce is anti-immigrant. He’s voted against raising the number of visas for skilled workers. He’s voted to end family immigration, which is your right as an American to sponsor a family member to come to the United States. And that’s been one of the prime ways that the Asian American community has grown in the US.


Not only that, he wants to end birthright citizenship. The 14th Amendment guarantees that if you’re born in the US, you’re an American citizen, and he says “nope.” If you don’t have at least one parent that’s an American citizen, you’re not an American. My parents came on a student visa, and they weren’t Americans, but I was born here and my brother was, so we’re Americans, and we’ve contributed just like other Americans have.


He also supports getting rid of multilingual federal services. He wants English-only for Medicare and Social Security forms. He wants balloting to be English-only. That’s an attack on the Voting Rights Act, and an attack on minorities and their right to participate in democracy.

Given your district has such a large Asian and Latino community, is immigration and multiculturalism going to be a key part of your campaign?


Oh absolutely, because this district is so diverse. It’s 30 percent Asian and 30 percent Latino. It’s majority-minority. It would be a travesty if someone with these kinds of views were to represent a district as diverse as this.


There were some articles written about how Ed Royce attended this hate rally in Yorba Linda, and how he said multiculturalism is “paralyzing” our society.


He blames multiculturalism for the ills of society. That’s crazy. Multiculturalism is what makes America great. If you take a look at some of the hottest companies that are formed, they’re all formed by immigrants or children of immigrants. So we’re definitely going to hit him on that.

How will you win if your district is pegged as “solidly Republican”?


If you just take a look at the numbers, it’s 41 percent Republican and 33 percent Democrat, and then maybe 25 percent Independent. So for someone who doesn’t understand this district, they automatically assume this is a safe Republican seat.


But what they fail to recognize is that Asians are prototypical swing voters. A lot of Asians are registered Republican but are not wed to the GOP. If you put a qualified Asian Democrat in front of them, they’ll vote for that person.


My own school board election was evidence of that. The typical Asian share of vote in my district is about 20 percent. When I ran in 2007 and 2011, the Asian share bounced up to 42 percent. It doubled. The increase came from Independents and Republicans.


We also did a poll of likely voters, and when likely voters hear about my story and Ed Royce’s story, we’re in a statistical dead heat. The increase comes from Latinos, Asians, and independent voters. Washington DC operates very far away, and they don’t have much experience reaching out to Asian voters. And it’s too bad, but we understand it, and we think it’s winnable.


How will you counter Ed Royce’s sizable campaign war chest?


We’re just going to have to run a smarter campaign. He’s got tons of money, and can probably raise tons more by calling all his friends in the financial services industry. But we think there’s a natural ceiling in terms of support he can get.


Our strategy is to make sure all voters know what my background is. He’s going to label me as a tax-and-spend liberal. But the fact is, in our school district, we have never had furloughs and layoffs in the five years I’ve been on the board. We’ve had healthy reserves, and we’ve never operated at a deficit, which is something he can’t say for his 19 years in Congress.


And something else that we’re going to do:


我会讲中文,所以我会做很多中文语言的广告。他当然不回做这个



Y tambien vamos a hablar con los Latinos in espanol, y vamos a hacer advertismos in espanol.


So we’re going to go into language in a way that he will not be able to do. We think that’s going to generate even more voter interest in ways that has not been seen in the past.

We heard you got married this year!


I got married in Guatemala!

What’s your wife’s role in your campaign?


Karen has a huge role. She works part-time at the science center so she can work Thursdays and Fridays on my campaign. And she’s a great strategist. She was involved in politics before I was. She used to work for John Chiang, the state controller. She introduced me to a lot of the Los Angeles political scene before I ran for office.


And she agreed to postpone our honeymoon until after the election. I mean, how many women would do that?

***

This post is part of Hyphen Politics, an ongoing series that looks at where Asian America and politics intersect in the run-up to the 2012 general election.

Lin Yang is the political editor of Hyphen magazine.

AAI Supports UT Affirmative Action Policy in Fisher v UT

Editor’s note: This is from our friends at the Asian American Institute.

Later this year, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear the case of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (UT).  The Court will consider a challenge to the constitutionality of UT’s consideration of race as one factor in a holistic, individualized review of about 25 percent of its undergraduate applicants’ admissions profiles.

Two years ago when the Fisher case was before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice (Advancing Justice), whose members are Asian Pacific American Legal Center (APALC), Asian American Justice Center (AAJC), Asian American Institute (AAI) and Asian Law Caucus (ALC), filed an amicus, or friend-of-the court, brief to support UT’s admissions policy.

We support affirmative action and diversity programs in admissions because we stand by the promise of integrated and equal public education set out in Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that declared legal racial segregation in public education to be unconstitutional.  Continuing the positive legacy of that seminal case, consideration of race in admissions programs addresses the need to level the playing field across all levels of education.

We still need affirmative action and diversity programs because racial segregation and discrimination continue to impede access to educational opportunity in this country today.  Many of our K-12 schools are more segregated today than they were 40 years ago.  Our schools are still separate and unequal in funding, class size, number of AP classes, and teacher turnover and experience.  This segregation and inequality affects not only African Americans and Latinos, but many underrepresented Asian American subgroups and Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders (NHPIs).  Asian Americans and NHPIs graduate from high school at lower rates than non-Hispanic whites, and disparities in high school and post-secondary graduation statistics are particularly stark for some ethnic groups like Hmong, Cambodian, Laotian and Vietnamese Americans, whose educational attainment rates are similar to those of Latinos and African Americans.  Far from being “race-neutral,” universities’ sole use of criteria like grades and test scores has been shown to unfairly capture and exacerbate those racial inequalities.  The reality of race must be taken into account to ensure equal access to our public universities.

Advancing Justice also believes that a truly integrated and diverse learning environment enhances students’ educational experiences and better prepares them for success in our increasingly multi-racial society.

Given the racial discrimination that persists against people of color, including Asian Americans and NHPIs, in many arenas, race-conscious strategies are fundamental to ensuring equal opportunity and access in all sectors of our diverse society. We further believe that students of all races will benefit from an expansion – instead of shrinking – of the public higher education system.  UCLA, which does not consider race as a factor in admissions, received more than 91,000 applications for approximately 5,400 spaces in the incoming fall 2012 class.  The lack of adequate resources for higher education is the primary, underlying cause that many qualified applicants – including Asian Americans and NHPIs -are denied admission.  It is this issue of expanding higher education resources that should be the focus of those who care about educational opportunity for Asian Americans and NHPIs

This summer, we will work together-and with you-to reaffirm our support for UT’s consideration of race as one of many factors in its admissions decisions by filing an amicus brief before the Supreme Court.

Advancing Justice is not alone in its support of affirmative action.  The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF) also released a statement, as did the Organization of Chinese Americans, affirming their commitment to affirmative action and diversity policies.

In addition, Sissy Trinh, Executive Director of the Southeast Asian Community Alliance which works with high school students in Los Angeles’ Chinatown, stated, “Southeast Asian American students often face barriers to higher education.  Taking into account the entirety of an applicant’s background and life experiences, including race, is important to ensure fair access to educational opportunities for Southeast Asians and other communities.”


 With your support, Advancing Justice can strengthen its work to ensure equal opportunity for all Asian American and NHPI communities.  Make your tax-deductible donation to your Advancing Justice affiliate, the Asian American Institute, today and help us continue the fight to protect important policies like the one at UT. To find out more about the Asian American Institute, please visit aaichicago.org or follow us on Facebook and Twitter.

Thank you for your continued support.

###

The Asian American Institute (www.aaichicago.org) is one of the leading pan-Asian nonprofit organizations in the Midwest, dedicated to empowering the Asian American community through advocacy, by utilizing research, education, and coalition-building. The Asian American Institute, Asian American Justice Center, Asian Law Caucus, and Asian Pacific American Legal Center are members of the Asian American Center for Advancing Justice.

APAICS Event Wed May 9: Leadership for Generations: Shaping Our Future through AAPI Families

Editor’s Note: Note that Norman Mineta is the recipient of our 2012 AAA-Fund Award at our Annual Gala and Mike Honda is on our Honorary Board. We encourage you to celebrate Asian Pacific American Heritage Month by checking out the APAICS‘ work as they share our same mission.

We invite you to attend the APAICS inter-generational event sponsored by AARP on Wednesday, May 9, 2012 from 10-11:30 am at the LBJ auditorium at the Department of Education located at 400 Maryland Ave SW, Washington, DC 20202 (Google Maps). The roundtable entitled “Leadership for Generations: Shaping Our Future through AAPI Families” will honor the legacy of public service that has been passed down from generation to generation within AAPI families. The event will be a round table with moderator and will feature prominent inter-generational pairs within the AAPI community. The discussion will focus on how an ethos of service was passed from one generation to the next.

The conversation will follow each panelist’s history of involvement. The hosts invites anyone with a rich background in teaching, military service and government service to speak and has also invited a wide array of AAPI groups, non profits and members to listen and ask questions and we will take questions from Facebook, Twitter & other social media services.

We will update this post with the final participants. Richard Lui, MSNBC News Anchor, will moderate the panel. Other panelists include Secretary Norman Y. Mineta, Congressman Mike Honda and Campbell, CA Vice Mayor Evan Low who will share the stage to discuss their intergenerational leadership and their interconnections. There will food and drink at the event. Post any questions or comments below.

Pre-register here for this event.

Balitang America: Filipinos Unite for Pinoys Running for CA Senate

The below is a reposting of “FILIPINOS UNITE FOR KABABAYANS RUNNING FOR CA ASSEMBLY” about Rob Bonta who we endorse as candidate for the California State Assembly District 18 (Alameda, Oakland, San Leandro). We also note the segment on Balitang America about his campaign.

FILIPINO UNITE FOR PINOYS RUNNING FOR CA SENATE

By Henni Espinosa, ABS-CBN North America Bureau

April 13, 2012

OAKLAND, Calif. – It is a political feat Filipinos have yet to achieve. No Filipino has ever won the California assembly or senate seat. But all that could change this coming June election.

Three Filipinos are runing for the assembly seat in different districts — Alameda Vice Mayor Rob Bonta, Lathrop Vice-Mayor Chris Mateo and the Alameda County Status of Women Commissioner, Dr. Jennifer Ong.

Having three Filipinos vie for higher office has brought Republicans and Democrats together for a common cause: Get them elected.

Last night, the Asian Pacific Islander Public Affairs Association hosted a town hall debate featuring Bonta and two other candidates from his district, Abel Guillen and Joel Young.

Filipino community leaders from both Republican and Democratic parties were there to support him.

Charito Benipayo, API State Chair for the Republican Party said, “I believe he can do it and he can represent Filipino Americans.”

Fel Amistad, Chair of the FilAm Democratic Club of San Mateo County said, “Our community should be behind him.”

The Manila-born Filipino-American is the current Vice-Mayor of Alameda. Throughout his career in public service, the 40-year old Bonta said he has advocated for California’s public schools, fought to prevent layoffs of firefighters and police officers and foster economic development.

Bonta, candidate for the 18th Assembly District said, “It is an exciting time to break once and for all a glass ceiling that’s been there for far too long and I’m hoping to do that with the support of the entire Filipino community.”

But other non-Filipino candidates like Joel Young said, it may not always be about the same ethnicity. He said, “I certainly feel that as long as someone is coming to the table, with their heart and coming to the table with their mind, then they can adequately represent a whole diverse group of people.”

For politicians, the Filipino community could be a goldmine of votes. There are an estimated 300,000 Filipinos in the San Francisco Bay Area and neighboring counties, ranking second to the Chinese in total population among API communities.

There is power in Filipino American votes. Reports show that in the last 12 years, California’s registered voters increased by 1.3 million, all from ethnic groups.

You may contact Henni Espinosa at henni_espinosa@abs-cbn.com for more information.

Marion Barry Won’t Apologize for Anti-Racist Comment

crack job Marion Barry Got to do something about those Asians

To add some context to Organizations Condemn Councilmember Marion Barry’s Statements Regarding Asian Businesses, the quote is

We got to do something about these Asians coming in and opening up businesses and dirty shops,” Barry said. “They ought to go. I’m going to say that right now. But we need African-American businesspeople to be able to take their places, too.

(Marion Barry Asian Remarks Create Stir; Mayor, Council Colleagues Condemn Comments)

Read more on the story at

Now for my personal take. Naturally, I’m also personally outaged at Barry’s hateful remarks. His dangerous and hateful remarks, especially as a publically elected DC Councilmember is pathetic. That says something about those who elected him, too, in case a pass.

Speaking of a pass, his friends and supporters say that his years of service to the city means he should get a pass. Yeah right, stirring up racial hatred gets a pass? Come on, ridiculous, I don’t need to write out my thoughts on that. Even more arrogantly, they demand an apology from the media. Don’t pull a Palin, Barry.

The DC Office of Asian Pacific Islander Affairs which Barry helped to create and that he as Mayor was a proponent of hiring AAPIs into DC government are commendable BUT for him to target a community, regardless of whether it’s ours or any other, and to speak hatefully and prejudically requires not just an honest apology but punishment. Don’t be fooled by the exterior. I’ve written for years about those who use something to excuse their personal flaws, like Christians who abuse Christianity to hate gays. We know better. Barry’s drug-wheeling, corrupt, woman-using self speaks for itself.

Don’t elect such hate-filled types this election like his supporters did. Do your research. If you’re unable or too lazy to research yourself, then post a comment here and we’ll do it for you. We enjoy such work. Progressives believe in an inclusive, diverse, and progressive America which works together to solve problems with all parties at the table to create a meaningful resolution. Not the politician with the cheapest soundbyte.

– Richard Chen

Organizations Condemn Councilmember Marion Barry’s Statements Regarding Asian Businesses

The AAA-Fund is a signatory to the “Organizations Condemn Councilmember Marion Barry’s Statements Regarding Asian Businesses (April 5, 2011):

Organizations Condemn Councilmember Marion Barry’s Statements Regarding Asian Businesses (April 5, 2011)

by Public Demands Marion Barry Apologize to APA Community on Thursday, April 5, 2012 at 8:51pm ·
http://bit.ly/aapi-mbarry
As members of local and national organizations committed to advancing and protecting the rights of individuals of Asian and Pacific Islander descent in the United States, the undersigned organizations condemn District of Columbia Councilmember Marion Barry’s recent remarks regarding Asian-owned businesses at a campaign event in Washington, DC. On April 3, at his Ward 8 primary election victory party, Councilmember Barry made the following statement, “We got to do something about these Asians coming in and opening up businesses and dirty shops … They ought to go. I’m going to say that right now.” Given Councilmember Barry’s previous commitment to civil rights, we are particularly disappointed by these comments. While Councilmember Barry has recently indicated that he was “sorry for offending the Asian community,” we call upon him to provide a sincere apology and ensure meaningful engagement with our communities to improve the well-being of all individuals in the District.

Councilmember Barry’s statement is of serious concern because it undermines the notion that developing the District of Columbia’s economy and neighborhoods is in the interest of all communities, regardless of national origin or ethnic background. Numerous institutions, from small businesses to non-profit organizations, as well as individuals, provide vital services and job opportunities, contribute their tax dollars, and engage in civic and political life within the city. Within the District of Columbia, according to 2007 data, Asians own 5.9% of businesses, joining other communities in strengthening the economy. Rather than acknowledging and appreciating the contributions that Asian businesses, alongside other racial and ethnic communities, have made to the city, Councilmember Barry’s remarks appear to fan the flames of racial divisions and imply that Asian Americans are not invested in developing a robust economy that benefits all residents.

Our organizations are also extremely concerned that remarks such as these can perpetuate stereotypes of Asians taking jobs away from other Americans, which can fuel racism and animosity towards community members. In fact, individuals of Asian descent are frequently blamed for the economic woes that this country has faced when perceptions are fostered that our community is thriving in this economy at the expense of other minority communities with whom we work and live alongside.

In light of these concerns, we call upon Councilmember Barry to provide a meaningful apology and officially retract his statement; refrain from engaging in harmful rhetoric regarding Asian and other immigrant communities; and develop meaningful relationships with our communities in the District of Columbia to understand the contributions and challenges of community members. Our organizations also view this as a prime opportunity to work with Mayor Vincent Gray and Councilmembers on the “One City, One Future” initiative. We look forward to proactively identifying next steps that we can take together to continue to create more diverse and growing economy for all residents.

Local Endorsing Organizations
Asian American LEAD (AALEAD)
Asian Pacific American Bar Association of the Greater Washington DC Area
Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance – DC Chapter (APALA-DC)
Asian Pacific American Legal Resource Center (APALRC)
Dana Tai Soon Burgess & Co
DC Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) Caucus
KhushDC
Korean American Drycleaners Association
Korean American Grocers Association of Greater Washington DC (KAGRO-DC)
Many Languages One Voice
National Organization of Vietnamese American Leaders of Greater Washington DC
Network of South Asian Professionals (NetSAP DC)
South Asian American Bar Association – DC (SABA-DC)
Washington Area Liquor Retailers Association (WALRA)

National Endorsing Organizations
APIAVote
Asian American Action Fund
Asian American Justice Center, Member of Asian American Center for Advancing Justice
Asian Pacific American Institute for Congressional Studies (APAICS)
Asian Pacific Islander American Health Forum (APIAHF)
Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance (APALA)
Council of Korean Americans
Japanese American Citizens League (JACL)
National Korean American Service and Education Consortium (NAKASEC)
National Asian Pacific American Center on Aging (NAPCA)
National Asian Pacific American Families Against Substance Abuse (NAPAFASA)
National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum (NAPAWF)
National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development (National CAPACD)
OCA
Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund (SALDEF)
South Asian Americans Leading Together (SAALT)
Southeast Asia Action Resource Center (SEARAC)

For further information or inquiries, contact Sapna Pandya, Executive Director of Many Languages One Voice at or 202-621-0001.

Join their Facebook Page to get updates on this coordinated campaign and for more on the story.

SEIU Endorses Mark Takano for Congress

Editor’s Note: The SEIU has joined us in supporting Mark Takano for Congress!

Mark Takano Endorsed by Service Employees International Union

Riverside, California – Mark Takano’s campaign for Congress today announced that his candidacy has been endorsed by the Service Employees International Union, one of the most active and important organizations in America’s labor movement.

“Mark Takano is a teacher who was born and raised in Riverside County and is grounded in the real concerns of our communities,” said Barbara Washington-Knight, an SEIU member and registered nurse from Moreno Valley. “We need good jobs, educational opportunities, affordable and secure healthcare, and clean air and water. It’s time to send someone to Congress who will tackle the real issues. We’re proud to endorse Mark in his run to represent the 41st District in Congress.”

SEIU Locals within the 41st Congressional District represent thousands of hardworking Californians, including nurses, librarians, teachers, engineering technicians, service workers and members of other professions. SEIU is the fastest-growing union in North America.

“I am proud to have the endorsement of SEIU. As a candidate for Congress, I am running to be not only a representative of my community in Washington, but an advocate for the issues that matter most to local families. SEIU’s priorities — improving education, expanding access to health care, and creating good-paying jobs for hardworking Americans — are shared by families throughout the Inland Empire,” said Mr. Takano.

Since entering the race for Congress last year, Mr. Takano has won the support of more than a dozen labor organizations, including the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the Communications Workers of America, the United Steelworkers, and the International Union of Operating Engineers amongst others.

A lifelong resident of Riverside, Mark Takano was elected to the Riverside Community College District Board of Trustees in 1990 and won re-election to the board in 1995, 1999, 2004 and 2008. He is the longest serving current board member and one of the longest serving Democratic elected officials in Riverside County.  As a trustee he has championed reform of secondary education, emphasizing Early College High Schools and more opportunities for career and technical education. Takano has worked as a classroom teacher in the Rialto Unified School District for the past 23 years.

The newly created 41st Congressional District includes the cities of Riverside, Moreno Valley, Perris and Jurupa Valley.  The district has a 7% voter registration advantage for Democrats. Barack Obama carried the district by a 20% margin in 2008 and Governor Jerry Brown won the district by 12% in 2010.

 

###

Oakland Shootings: Inhumane indeed


Emergency response officials looked over at the dead while a policeman ran by on Edgewater. Police are confirming that seven people were shot and killed at Oikos University on Edgewater Street in Oakland, Calif. Monday April 2, 2012.

Photo: Brant Ward / The Chronicle

As the Oakland shooting victims are identified, we now have faces to put to the formerly anonymous names, enhancing the depth of the loss for Oakland, Korean-Americans, our community, and so much more.

Oakland Mayor Jean Quan rightly noted, “This is America, where you can find a gun easier than you can find mental health counseling.” (source)

Yet, the narrow-minded won’t care. No amount of scholarly or think tank studies showing how more guns thus gun owners kills more, no amount of smart articles about the cycle of violence, nothing will change the minds of the narrow-minded who’ve already decided that they want guns and nothing will ever stop their getting them. Nothing as it would literally be their dying oath to fight for that cause of theirs.

Such politicization and overcharging of a human issue hampers not politics but mere humanity. How did we reach a point when overcharged politics overcomes humane consideration for our fellow human? This is America? I fear it is. With a nation politically unengaged thus unwilling or unable to stop gun-obsessed loons, of course it’s easier to get a gun than mental health counseling. America is supposed to be a better nation for this?

Enough with the rant, let us remember the victims:

God bless their souls here and forever.

Sen. Reid Remarks on Miranda Du for US District Court in Nevada

REID REMARKS ON MIRANDA DU, AN EXPERIENCED LITIGATOR NOMINATED FOR U.S. DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Washington, D.C. – Nevada Senator Harry Reid spoke on the Senate floor today regarding the nomination of Miranda Du to the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada. Below are his remarks as prepared for delivery:

Today the Senate will consider the nomination of Miranda Du to the U.S. District Court, District of Nevada, in Las Vegas.

I was pleased to recommend the nomination of such an experienced litigator and proud Nevadan.

Ms. Du has an enormous love for the state of Nevada, and a tremendous dedication to public service.

She also has an inspiring personal story that proves the American Dream is alive and well.

Although 9 percent of Nevada’s population is Asian-Pacific American, if confirmed Ms. Du will be the first Asian-American federal judge in the history of the state.

Ms. Du left Vietnam with her family by boat when she was just eight years old.

She lived in refugee camps in Malaysia before she came to America with her family when she was almost 10.

She didn’t speak English when she enrolled in an American school for the first time. But even as a third-grader she was quick to learn, and picked up the language right away.

Although her family initially lived in Alabama, where her father worked on a dairy farm, Du eventually moved to California.

There she continued to indulge her love of learning. She received her Bachelor’s degree in history and economics from the University of California, Davis and her law degree from UC Berkley.

It was after law school that she moved to Nevada. She joined McDonald Carano Wilson, a very well-respected law firm in my home state, and made partner in 2002.

Ms. Du is currently the chairwoman of her firm’s Employment & Labor Law Practice Group.

She specializes in complex civil litigation and employment law.

And she has appeared before federal and state courts in all phases of litigation, including appeals before the Nevada Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Ms. Du has the support of a bipartisan coalition of Nevada officials, including the governor, the lieutenant governor and the mayor of Reno – all Republicans.

Republican Governor Brian Sandoval wrote the Judiciary Committee to say Du “has exhibited great character and is well respected in the legal community.”  He gave her his full support.

Republican Lieutenant Governor Brian Krolicki called Ms. Du “intelligent, inquisitive, reliable and dedicated.”

And the Republican Mayor of Reno, Robert Cashell, said Du “will be a great addition to our federal bench.”

In addition to being an experienced litigator, Ms. Du is also an outstanding citizen. She is very involved in the Northern Nevada community.

She currently serves on the Nevada Commission on Economic Development and the board of directors of the Nevada Women’s Fund, a group dedicated to strengthening the Nevada community by empowering women.

She has also served as a court-appointed special advocate representing abused and neglected children and mentored high school students in Reno.

She is a fine example for those students. And I’m confident she’ll make an outstanding federal judge.

###