May 17, 2012

What the Folly: Governator granted 11th hour commutation for son of political ally

Ed. Note: The below is a re-posting of “Governator granted 11th hour commutation for son of political ally“.

Fabian Nunez

Outgoing California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger commuted the prison sentence of Esteban Nuñez, the son of Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (left) and ex-Assembly Speaker Fabian Nuñez (right). PHOTO CREDITS: Flickr (Lon R. Fong) & Wikipedia public domain image ex-State Assembly speaker Fabian Nuñez. It seems like the Governator is tough on crime except when it comes to protecting his political crony.

Nuñez’s son, Esteban, was sentenced to 16 years in prison after copping to a plea deal for his role in the stabbing death of Luis Dos Santos, a student at San Diego Mesa College. The deadly altercation took place after Esteban Nuñez and his friends were refused entry to a fraternity party near San Diego State. Santos was stabbed in the heart and three of his friends suffered stab wounds during the fight. Before settling for a plea deal with the San Diego county district attorney’s office, Nuñez was facing murder charges in Santo’s death and, if convicted, would have faced life in prison.

But Esteban Nuñez is quite lucky because he’s got an influential Daddy. (How many first time violent offenders get their sentences commuted by the Governor?) Fabian Nuñez, a prominent Los Angeles Democrat, was the Governator’s right hand man in the California Assembly. After being term-limited, Daddy Nuñez became a partner at Mercury Public Affairs where former Schwarzenegger staffers (like Adam Mendelsohn, Tracy Arnold, Becky Warren, and Laura Braden) now work. One can reasonably conclude that Daddy Nuñez has the type of political access and influence to persuade Governor Schwarzenegger to grant an 11th hour commutation that reduced Estefan Nuñez‘s sentence to just seven years without even consulting the San Diego county district attorney’s office.

Fred Santos, father of the stabbing victim, told the Los Angeles Times:

The governor did not even have the courtesy to notify the victim’s family…This is dirty politics: cutting backroom deals. I guess if you’re the son of somebody important you can kill someone and get all sorts of breaks.

Too bad Fred Santos is not a career politician or a big-time political donor. Fred Santos is simply a software engineer and heartbroken father who was obviously deemed unimportant by the Sacramento politicians like Fabian Nuñez and Arnold Schwarzenegger. Remember Fred Santos’ pain the next time Fabian Nuñez runs for public office.

AAJC and NAPABA Concerned by Blocking of Judicial Nominees

Ed.’s Note: The below is from our friends at

AAJC: Advancing EqualityNational Asian Pacific American Bar Association

WASHINGTON–Prior to adjourning for its August recess, the Senate failed to vote on the nominations of Asian Pacific American judicial nominees Judge Edward M. Chen and Professor Goodwin Liu, as well as several other judicial candidates. Their nominations have been returned to President Obama and NAPABA and AAJC strongly encourage President Obama to resubmit their nominations when the Senate returns from recess in September.

“We are seeing extensive delays affecting all nominees,” said Joseph J. Centeno, president of the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association. “Highly qualified nominees such as Judge Chen and Professor Liu are entitled to a full Senate vote in a timely fashion.  All Americans have an interest in having a qualified and diverse judiciary and these nominees deserve a confirmation vote.”

Both Judge Chen and Professor Liu received unanimous “well qualified” ratings from the American Bar Association, the highest rating possible. Delays in the Senate are disproportionately affecting minority nominees–five of the six longest-pending judicial candidates are minorities, and the sixth is a woman.

Judge Chen was first nominated Aug. 6, 2009 and has been waiting longer than any other nominee for a confirmation vote. He was favorably voted out of the Senate Judiciary Committee in October 2009 but the full Senate did not take up his confirmation before the legislative session ended, which automatically returned his name to the president. President Obama immediately re-nominated him and the Judiciary Committee approved him again in February 2010. 

“The Senate’s failure to hold full confirmation votes on judicial nominees is hurting our judicial system’s efficiency and accessibility,” said Karen K. Narasaki, president and executive director of the Asian American Justice Center. “These extensive delays and inaction are a critical issue when more than 10 percent of federal judgeships are vacant and our courts are overburdened.”

Of 876 federal judgeships, 100 are vacant and 46 are considered “judicial emergencies.” In the Northern District of California, the seat that Judge Chen awaits confirmation for has been vacant for more than 860 days. Moreover, each judge in the district handles more than 600 cases per year—more than 1.5 times the national average.   

“A qualified jurist such as Judge Chen should not wait more than a year for a confirmation vote,” Narasaki said. “Time is running out and he should be voted on immediately.  We urge all Asian Pacific Americans to contact their senators and tell them to move for cloture on Judge Chen’s nomination as soon as they receive it.” 

AAJC and NAPABA thank California Sen. Dianne Feinstein for her efforts in trying to move Judge Chen’s and Professor Liu’s nominations forward.

###

The National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA) is the national association of Asian Pacific American attorneys, judges, law professors and law students. NAPABA represents the interests of over 40,000 attorneys and 63 local Asian Pacific American bar associations. Its members represent solo practitioners, large firm lawyers, corporate counsel, legal service and non-profit attorneys, and lawyers serving at all levels of government. NAPABA continues to be a leader in addressing civil rights issues confronting Asian Pacific American communities. Through its national network of committees and affiliates, NAPABA provides a strong voice for increased diversity of federal and state judiciaries, advocates for equal opportunity in the workplace, works to eliminate hate crimes and anti-immigrant sentiment, and promotes professional development of minorities in the legal profession.

The Asian American Justice Center (www.advancingequality.org), a member of Asian American Center for Advancing Justice (www.advancingjustice.org), works closely with its sister organizations – the Asian American Institute in Chicago (www.aaichicago.org), the Asian Law Caucus (www.asianlawcaucus.org) in San Francisco and the Asian Pacific American Legal Center (www.apalc.org) in Los Angeles – to promote a fair and equitable society for all by working for civil and human rights and empowering Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders and other underserved communities.

CEPR: Asian Pacific American Women Workers and Unions

Ed. Note: The below is from our friends at the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

Center for Economic and Policy Research logo

Asian Pacific American Women Workers and Unions

The Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) finds that 12.8% of Asian Pacific American (APA) women were in a union or represented by a union at their workplace, and it was a slightly higher share than for APA men (12.2%), for the period 2003-2009. (See tablehere.)

APA women in unions, on average, were better educated than unionized APA men. Close to 6-in-10 (56.9%) of unionized APA women had a college degree or more, compared to less than half (44.3%) of unionized APA men. About half of female APA workers and all female workers in unions (50.6% and 47.9%, respectively) were equally educated. (See figure below.)

Furthermore, immigrants were a large share of unionized APA women. More than two-thirds (68.5%) of unionized APA women were immigrants, compared to a slightly smaller share (65.6%) of unionized APA men. Immigrants were only a small fraction of all female and male workers in unions (11.7% and 12.4%, respectively).

Nearly half (46.6%) of unionized APA women were in the public sector. The share of unionized APA women in the public sector was a lot smaller than the share of the overall female workforce in unions (61.3%), but significantly larger than the share of the overall female APA workforce (11.7%) in the public sector. In comparison, about 4-in-10 (40.2%) of unionized APA men were in the public sector.

APA women in unions were highly concentrated in the Pacific states. More than 6-in-10 (63.4%) of unionized APA women were in Pacific states, with almost half (45.7%) in California and more than one-in-ten (11.5%) in Hawaii. Pacific states had a significantly higher share of unionized APA women, compared to the share of unionized APA men (56.7%), the share of female APA workers (45%), and the share of unionized female workers (22.5%).

CEPR also finds a substantial boost in wages and benefits for APA unionized workers and a particularly large union advantage for workers in low-wage occupations. On average, unionization raises APA workers’ wages by 9% – about $2.00 per hour.

pie chart: Unionized Female APA Workers, 2003-209, by Education

View our latest:
Reports
Op-eds & Columns
Data Bytes
Events

Donate
Please consider making a donation to CEPR. In addition to foundations, we rely on people like you to support our work.  

About
The Center for Economic and Policy Research is an independent, nonpartisan think tank that was established to promote democratic debate on the most important economic and social issues that affect people’s lives. CEPR’s Advisory Board includes Nobel Laureate economists Robert Solow and Joseph Stiglitz; Janet Gornick, Professor at the CUNY Graduate Center and Director of the Luxembourg Income Study; Richard Freeman, Professor of Economics at Harvard University; and Eileen Appelbaum, Professor and Director of the Center for Women and Work at Rutgers University.

Become our Fan on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

CEPR RSS Feed

Center for Economic and Policy Research, 1611 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20009
Phone: (202) 293-5380, Fax: (202) 588-1356

AALDEF: Defend Voting Rights Act, Challenge Ga.’s Discriminatory Voter Verification

AALDEF MEDIA RELEASE

For Immediate Release: Thursday, July 29, 2010

For More Information, Contact:

Glenn Magpantay, Dir., Democracy Prog., 212.966.5932 x206; 

**************************************

Asian Americans Join Lawsuit to Defend the Voting Rights Act and

to Challenge Georgia’s Discriminatory Voter Verification Procedures

**************************************

The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF), with pro bono co-counsel Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, has intervened in Georgia v. Holder, a lawsuit to approve the State of Georgia’s new voter verification procedures.  The matter is pending in federal court in Washington, DC.

The lawsuit was filed on June 22, 2010 by the State of Georgia against the U.S. Department of Justice.  It seeks to overturn an objection by the Department that the State’s voter registration procedures are flawed and discriminatory.  Georgia also asks the court to declare unconstitutional the enforcement provision (Section 5) of the Voting Rights Act. 

“The Voting Rights Act has provided Asian Americans with greater access to the electoral franchise.  The lawsuit seeks to strip away vital protections for minority voters,” said Glenn D. Magpantay, AALDEF Democracy Program Director.

Because Georgia has a history of voting discrimination against racial minorities, any changes to the voting process must be approved by the U.S. Department of Justice or U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia before they can go into effect.  The State must prove that the new procedures do not discriminate against minority voters. 

The intervention was filed on behalf of Marvin Lim, a naturalized citizen in Georgia who registered to vote but was told just days before the 2008 election that he could not vote, the Organization of Chinese Americans (OCA) Georgia Chapter, and the Asian American Legal Advocacy Center (AALAC) of Georgia.  The parties intervened on the side of the defendants, represented by the Department of Justice.

Norman Chu, President of OCA Georgia Chapter said, “OCA encourages the involvement of Asian Americans in the electoral franchise and has conducted voter registration drives.  Our members will be in a worse position to exercise their right to vote and to register to vote if Georgia’s voter verification procedures are precleared.”

Marvin Lim said, “I am a citizen and registered to vote, but I had to jump through many hoops to vote.  I tried to convince state lawmakers that the procedures are unfair to many Asian Americans – even those who produce documentation, such as myself.  They have not listened, so I am speaking out today to protect democracy.” 

Helen Kim Ho, Executive Director of AALAC said, “AALAC firmly supports policies that promote equal access to voting.  The verification system has hampered tens of thousands of US citizens from exercising their right to vote.  Asian American citizens were twice as likely to be flagged as white voter registrants.  The system is flawed and has a disproportionately negative impact on Asian American citizens in Georgia.”

AALDEF and the Asian American intervenors joined other intervenors, including the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund (MALDEF), which is representing the Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials (GALEO), and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) Voting Rights Project and Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, which are representing the Georgia Association of Black Elected Officials, Georgia NAACP, and Georgia Coalition for the People’s Agenda.

###

 

The Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF), founded in 1974, is a national organization that protects and promotes the civil rights of Asian Americans.  By combining litigation, advocacy, education, and organizing, AALDEF works with Asian American communities across the country to secure human rights for all.

******************************************************************************
ASIAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATION FUND
99 Hudson Street, 12th FL, New York, NY 10013-2815
Defending the civil rights of Asian Americans since 1974
tel: 212.966.5932  fax: 212.966.4303  www.aaldef.org 
Facebook: bit.ly/aaldef  Twitter: @aaldef

CAPAC applauds Senate confirmation of Judge Denny Chin for 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals

Ed. note: Congressman Mike Honda is also on the AAA-Fund Board Honorary Chair.


April 22, 2010 Contact: Gloria Chan
For Immediate Release Phone: (202) 302.8606

CAPAC applauds Senate confirmation of Judge Denny Chin for 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals

Chin to be sole Asian American serving as federal appellate court judge

Washington, DC – Today, the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC) applauds the Senate confirmation of Judge Denny Chin to serve as a Circuit Judge on the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Judicial diversity has been one of CAPAC’s top concerns, and as such has endorsed Asian American, Pacific Islander (AAPI), and other diverse candidates for the bench, including Judge Denny Chin. Upon swearing in, Judge Chin will be the sole Asian American judge among the approximately 175 active federal appellate court judges nationwide.

“CAPAC celebrates the confirmation of Judge Chin, a well-respected jurist who will be the sole Asian American appellate judge serving on the federal bench,” said Rep. Michael Honda (CA-15), Chair of CAPAC. “The Senate has acted upon President Obama’s commitment to building a federal judiciary with high caliber jurists, while increasing Asian American representation in our federal courts.”

Although only 54 years old, Judge Chin is currently the longest serving active Asian American judge, and for many years, served as one of only eight active AAPI Article III judges nationwide. He was nominated by President Clinton and confirmed in 1994 as a United States District Judge for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. He was the first AAPI federal district court judge to sit outside of the Ninth Circuit.

During his almost fifteen years on the bench, Judge Chin has established a reputation as a fair-minded, intelligent, and hard-working judge. He has sat by designation on the Second Circuit numerous times, and is poised to contribute immediately to that court’s heavy workload. Lawyers who have appeared before him, even those against whom he has ruled, have commended him for his fairness and judicial temperament. Many of the traits that make Judge Chin an excellent jurist can be traced to his own background. Judge Chin was born in Hong Kong, and moved to the United States at age two. His father worked as a cook in Chinese restaurants, while his mother worked as a seamstress in the garment industry. His upbringing epitomizes the all-American story of families seeking to create a better life in the United States. To this day, one of Judge Chin’s favorite duties is swearing in new citizens of the United States.

“Judge Chin devotes much of his time to mentoring young lawyers and law students and, most recently, to several of the recently confirmed Asian American judges, both at the federal and state level,” said Honda. “He has been a tremendous asset to our community. Judge Chin’s confirmation to the Second Circuit is an important milestone not only for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, but is part of President Obama’s legacy to change the face of the federal bench to more accurately reflect the rich diversity of our country.”

Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders have been underrepresented in the federal judiciary, constituting less than 1% of the bench prior to President Obama’s Administration. In his first year and a half in office, President Obama has already doubled the federal presence of Asian American and Pacific Islander judges with the confirmations of Judges Chin, Dolly Gee, and Jacqueline Nguyen, and the judicial nominations of Judge Ed Chen, Professor Goodwin Liu, Prosecutor Edmond E. Chang, and Judge Leslie Kobayashi, and Judge Lucy Koh.

###

The Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus (CAPAC) is comprised of Members of Congress of Asian and Pacific Islander descent and members who have a strong dedication to promoting the well-being of the Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) community. Since 1994, CAPAC has been addressing the needs of the AAPI community in all areas of American life. For more information on CAPAC, please call (202) 225-2631 or visit http://www.honda.house.gov/capac.

NAPABA Applauds Nomination of Alicia G. Limtiaco for US Attorney of Guam & N Mariana Islands

AAJC: Advancing Equality

National Asian Pacific American Bar Association

National Asian Pacific American Bar Association

1612 K Street N.W., Suite 1400

Washington, DC 20006

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Brian Wang

March 3, 2010

(202) 775-9555

NAPABA APPLAUDS NOMINATION OF ALICIA G. LIMTIACO TO SERVE AS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY OF GUAM AND NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS

Washington, D.C. – On February 24, Alicia G. Limtiaco was nominated by President Obama to serve as the United States Attorney for the Districts of Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.  If confirmed, Limtiaco will become the first-ever woman to serve as a United States Attorney for Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands, and she will become only the third Asian Pacific American United States Attorney currently serving in the country.

“Ms. Limtiaco has succeeded at every stage of her career as a criminal prosecutor, civil litigator and public servant,” said Joseph J. Centeno, president of the National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA). “She will be an excellent U.S. Attorney.”

Limtiaco is the current Attorney General of Guam.  She is the first-ever woman to serve as Guam’s Attorney General, and only the second individual to be elected to the position, which was a gubernatorial appointment until 2002.  Limtiaco also served in the Office of the Attorney General of Guam as the Deputy Attorney General and as an Assistant Attorney General for over seven years between 1991 and 2000.

Limtiaco began her legal career as a law clerk for the Honorable Benjamin J. F. Cruz of the Superior Court of Guam from 1990 to 1991.  She worked in private practice for over eight years with various law firms and was a Partner at Limtiaco, Cruz & Sison, P.L.L.C.  Limtiaco has served as an adjunct faculty member for the University of Guam and for the Basic Law Enforcement Academy at Guam Community College.

NAPABA applauds President Obama for nominating Limtiaco and thanks Congresswoman Madeleine Z. Bordallo for recommending Limtiaco.

###

The National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA) is the national association of Asian Pacific American attorneys, judges, law professors and law students. NAPABA represents the interests of over 40,000 attorneys and 63 local Asian Pacific American bar associations. Its members represent solo practitioners, large firm lawyers, corporate counsel, legal service and non-profit attorneys, and lawyers serving at all levels of government. NAPABA continues to be a leader in addressing civil rights issues confronting Asian Pacific American communities. Through its national network of committees and affiliates, NAPABA provides a strong voice for increased diversity of federal and state judiciaries, advocates for equal opportunity in the workplace, works to eliminate hate crimes and anti-immigrant sentiment, and promotes professional development of minorities in the legal profession.

Goodwin Liu Poised to Make History

AAJC: Advancing Equality

National Asian Pacific American Bar Association

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

NAPABA Contact: Tina Matsuoka (202) 775-9555

February 24, 2010

AAJC Contact: Vincent A. Eng (202) 296-2300, ext. 121 (703) 981-6636 (Mobile)

NAPABA AND AAJC APPLAUD NOMINATION OF GOODWIN H. LIU TO THE FEDERAL APPELLATE COURT

Washington, D.C. – The National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA) and the Asian American Justice Center (AAJC) applauded today the decision of President Barack Obama to nominate University of California Berkeley School of Law Associate Dean and Professor Goodwin H. Liu to serve on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.  Professor Liu joins Judge Denny Chin, nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Second Circuit, as the second Asian Pacific American federal appellate court nomination by the President.  Currently, there are no Asian Pacific American judges among the approximately 175 active federal appellate court jurists nationwide.

“Professor Liu is an exceptional attorney who is well-respected by lawyers across the ideological spectrum,” said Joseph J. Centeno, president of NAPABA.  “Professor Liu also will bring much-needed diversity to the federal appellate court bench, where Asian Pacific Americans currently are not represented at all.”

It has been over five years since there has been an active Asian Pacific American federal appellate court judge.  In the history of the United States, only four Asian Pacific Americans have served as federal appellate court judges.

A distinguished graduate of Stanford University, Oxford University, and Yale Law School, Professor Liu is a Rhodes Scholar, a former Supreme Court clerk, and a member of the American Law Institute.  He has worked as a corporate litigator and as a key policy advisor in two federal agencies.  In 2003, Professor Liu returned to his home state of California to join the faculty of UC Berkeley School of Law, one of the nation’s top law schools, and earned tenure and promotion to Associate Dean in five years.

“We commend the President on nominating Professor Liu to the Ninth Circuit,” said Karen K. Narasaki, president and executive director of AAJC.  “Professor Liu has superb integrity, intellect, and fairness, and the Ninth Circuit undoubtedly will benefit from his presence on that court.”

Throughout his career, Professor Liu has gained wide respect for his intelligence, independence, and fair-mindedness.  That respect has included many Republicans and conservatives.  Clint Bolick, director of constitutional litigation at the Goldwater Institute, said, “Having reviewed several of his academic writings, I find Professor Liu to exhibit fresh, independent thinking and intellectual honesty.  He clearly possesses the scholarly credentials and experience to serve with distinction on this important court.”  Tom Campbell, former dean of the Haas School of Business at UC Berkeley and a law professor who served nine years in Congress as a Republican, said, “Liu will bring scholarly distinction and a strong reputation for integrity, fair-mindedness, and collegiality to the Ninth Circuit.”

Professor Liu’s tenure at UC Berkeley School of Law reflects the excellence that he will bring to the Ninth Circuit.  Jesse Choper, a leading constitutional scholar and chair of Professor Liu’s tenure committee at UC Berkeley, said, “Liu’s qualifications to be a judge are nothing short of outstanding.  He is a person of excellent judgment, with carefully considered and balanced views.  I am confident he would be an especially fair jurist, and one with real intellectual firepower.”  In the classroom, Professor Liu is one of the most popular teachers, and his courses are some of the most over-subscribed and highly rated by the students.  As Associate Dean of the law school, Professor Liu oversees the curriculum and takes the lead in setting instructional priorities, including the promotion process for tenure-track faculty, the hiring of new faculty, and the supervision of the law school’s lecturers and adjunct faculty.  “Goodwin is admired by his colleagues for his integrity, fairness, and good judgment,” said Christopher Edley, Dean of the law school.  “He is one of the brightest and most capable colleagues I’ve had in my three decades in academia.”

Professor Liu also has practical experience in the law.  Professor Liu served as a Special Assistant to the Deputy Secretary at the U.S. Department of Education.  In that capacity, he advised the Secretary and Deputy Secretary on a range of legal issues, including the development of guidelines to implement a $134 million congressional appropriation in 2000 to help turn around low-performing schools.  Former South Carolina Governor Richard Riley, who was U.S. Secretary of Education at the time, said Professor Liu was a “‘go-to’ person for important projects and complex issues because of his ability to see the big picture while also mastering the details of legal and policy problems.”  In additional to his public service, Professor Liu was an attorney with the corporate litigation practice of O’Melveny & Myers in Washington, D.C.  Walter Dellinger, chair of O’Melveny’s appellate practice, said Professor Liu was “widely respected in law practice for his superb legal ability, his sound judgment, and his warm collegiality.”

Professor Liu was born in Augusta, Georgia, to Taiwanese doctors recruited to work in the United States by American medical institutions seeking assistance in serving underserved areas.   Living in Georgia and then Florida in the late 1960s and early to mid-1970s, Professor Liu did not learn to speak English until kindergarten because his parents worried that Liu and his brother would acquire an accent if they were taught at home.  The family then moved to Sacramento in 1977.  Professor Liu’s interest in public service and the law was sparked when he served as a page in the U.S. House of Representatives, thanks to the sponsorship of the late Congressman Robert Matsui.

NAPABA and AAJC congratulate Professor Liu on his historic nomination.  The organizations thank President Obama for nominating him, and commend Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer for their support of Professor Liu’s nomination.

###

The National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA) is the national association of Asian Pacific American attorneys, judges, law professors and law students. NAPABA represents the interests of over 40,000 attorneys and 63 local Asian Pacific American bar associations. Its members represent solo practitioners, large firm lawyers, corporate counsel, legal service and non-profit attorneys, and lawyers serving at all levels of government. NAPABA continues to be a leader in addressing civil rights issues confronting Asian Pacific American communities. Through its national network of committees and affiliates, NAPABA provides a strong voice for increased diversity of federal and state judiciaries, advocates for equal opportunity in the workplace, works to eliminate hate crimes and anti-immigrant sentiment, and promotes professional development of minorities in the legal profession.

The Asian American Justice Center is a national organization dedicated to defending and advancing the civil and human rights of Asian Americans. It works closely with three affiliates – the Asian American Institute in Chicago, the Asian Law Caucus in San Francisco, and the Asian Pacific American Legal Center in Los Angeles – and nearly 100 community partners in 47 cities, 25 states and the District of Columbia.

So YOU want to be a Judge

South Asian Bar Association

The South Asian Bar Association
Presents
“So YOU want to be a Judge”
Come Join Us to Talk About Diversity on the State Bench and the Ins and Outs of the Application Process

Speakers:
Hon. Ted W. Lieu, Member of the Assembly, Chair of the Assembly Rules Committee
Hon. Peter Espinoza, Supervising Judge of the Criminal Division, Los Angeles County Superior Court
Holly J. Fujie, Former California State Bar President, Buchalter & Nember Partner

Date & Location
Fisher & Talwar, PLC
Thursday, January 21, 2010
6:30pm
801 S Grand Avenue
11th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90017 (Yahoo! Maps)

Parking available across the street
Light Appetizers and Drinks will be Served

Sponsored by

  • Fisher & Talwar, PLC
  • SABA

A Senseless Murder

Ed.’s Note: Dr. Judy Chu is an Honorary Board member of the Asian American Action Fund and was endsorsed by the Asian American Action Fund in her successful election in California’s 32nd Congressional District.

Congresswoman Judy Chu, Serving California's 32nd District

For Immediate Release
Contact: Fred Ortega
January 1, 2010
626-448-1271

202-525-9348 (cell)

***PRESS RELEASE***

Rep. Judy Chu Releases Statement on Murder of Bobby Salcedo

EL MONTE – Rep. Judy Chu (D-CA) issued the following statement today on the death of El Monte City School District Vice President Agustin “Bobby” Salcedo, who was abducted and murdered along with five other men on Wednesday night while visiting with family members in the city of Gomez Palacio, Durango, Mexico:

“Our community has lost a rising star and a tremendous leader with the death of Bobby Salcedo. My heart goes out to Bobby’s brother, Carlos, his wife Betzy and their entire family, as well as to his fellow school district colleagues and the faculty and students at El Monte High School where Bobby was an assistant principal, as they cope with the shock and sadness of this terrible loss.

“I urge the authorities in Durango, Mexico to direct all necessary resources toward solving this senseless killing and to bringing the murderers to justice. The Salcedo family, and indeed the entire El Monte and South El Monte community, deserve answers, and we will work hard to ensure that they get those answers and the justice they deserve.

“I have directed my staff in the district and in Washington to make sure the Salcedo family receives the assistance they require at this difficult time, and to work with our contacts in the Department of State and U.S. consulate authorities in Mexico to make sure there is appropriate coordination with Mexican law enforcement as the investigation develops.

“This incident is a terrible reminder of the drug war that is raging just south of our border, and most importantly, it shows that this conflict does not respect borders. We are all affected by the violence in Mexico, and that is why our federal government must do everything in its power to assist the Mexican authorities in their struggle against these ruthless drug gangs, including staunching the flow of weapons from the United States to Mexico and reducing demand for the drugs in our country. I vow to work with my Congressional colleagues to address this crucial issue, and to ensure that our citizens can once again travel to Mexico without fearing for their lives or the lives of their loved ones.”

Chinese-American Historical Day Now CA Law

Dear Friends and Supporters:

Please join California State Assemblymember Mike Eng, Yee Fow Museum, and other state and national organizations in commemorating the Repeal of the Chinese Exclusion Act and the recent passage of ACR 76 into Californian law. ACR 76 acknowledges December 17 as a “Day of Inclusion” in recognition and appreciation of the Repeal of the Chinese Exclusion Act. This landmark repeal of anti-Chinese immigration has led to the priceless contributions of all immigrants to the greatness of the United States and especially to our great state of California.

More information can be found online at <www.dec17.org>. We welcome your participation in this historic event.

Please join us:

Day of Inclusion Press Conference 1 PM – 1:30 PM, Sunday, Dec. 6th

Chinese American Museum
425 North Los Angeles St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Followed by a reception a few steps from the museum: 1:30 PM – 3:00 PM
The Pico House
424 N. Main St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Steve Yee
Vice Chair
Yee Fow Center for History, Culture, and Trade
Advisory Board
www.yeefowmuseum.org
California Deserves No Less

Assemblymember Mike Eng
ACR 76 (ENG) – Day of Inclusion

Sponsored by: Yee Fow Museum

Summary
ACR 76 would acknowledge December 17 as a “Day of Inclusion” in recognition and appreciation of the priceless contributions of all immigrants to the greatness of the United States and especially to our great state of California.

Background
The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 was the first major law to single out and forbid a specific ethnic group, the Chinese, from immigrating to and becoming naturalized citizens of the United States. The Geary Act of 1892, then extended the prohibitions of the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and imposed new and onerous requirements on Chinese immigrants. In the wake of both statutes, additional laws were enacted to perpetuate discrimination and unequal treatment of Chinese and other minority groups, such as the Alien Land Law of 1913 that prohibited “aliens ineligible for citizenship” from owning land or property and the Immigration Act of 1924 which limited the total number of immigrants who could be admitted from any one country and also prohibited immigration of all Asians.

On December 17, 1943, the Magnuson Act repealed the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 and marked a turning point regarding society’s harsh attitudes towards immigration and immigrants. By repealing the “Chinese Exclusion” prohibitions, the United States expressed its commitment to continue to break down cultural barriers, appreciate differences, enrich cultural diversity, and further racial, religious and cultural tolerance.

In many respects, immigrants and their descendants play and have played a large and central role in the continuing progress and betterment of our nation and society. For example, according to data from the 2000 United States Census, immigrant business owners generate $67 billion of the $577 billion in United States business income, or approximately 12 percent, as estimated by the federal Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy.

Staff Contact:
To support this measure or for more information, contact Annie Lam in Assemblymember Eng’s office at (916) 319-2049 or Annie.Lam@asm.ca.gov